FQL is a query language that allows you to retrieve, filter and project data from any data source containing FHIR Resources. It brings the power of three existing languages together: SQL, JSON and FhirPath. It allows you to create tables and is useful for gaining insight and perform quality control.
-
Default
What is FQL?
-
FQL Query resources
FQL Playground
Try Firely Query Language in our playground by using this scope as data source.
- FQL Documentation
-
FQL Language
Syntax specification
To learn more about FQL syntax choose this menu item.
-
YamlGen Generate resources
YamlGen Playground
Try YamlGen in our playground by using this scope as data source.
-
YamlGen Language
YamlGen Syntax specification
To learn more about YamlGen syntax choose this.
-
FHIRPath Inspect resource
FHIRPath Playground
Try out the FHIRPath playground and navigate inside this resource.
-
FHIRPath Documentation
FHIRPath Documentation
Find out what FHIRPath is or learn how to write FHIRPath scripts.
-
FHIR
Get this resource using a FHIR client.
-
Embed
Embed this resource in your own website. How?
NPCRBiopsyResultsObservationTypes
NPCR-internal code system identifying the component types used across three biopsy-results observation profiles: NPCRBiopsyResultsTargetedBiopsyObservation, NPCRBiopsyResultsSystematicBiopsyObservation, and NPCRBiopsyResultsUnclearBiopsyObservation. Unlike the Gleason score family — where three source-specific profiles share an identical 4-component structure — biopsy results metrics differ by source:
- Targeted biopsies measure: cores count, longest cancer lesion, total biopsy length of the longest-cancer biopsy (plus per-metric missing flags). 6 components total.
- Systematic biopsies measure: cores count, cores with cancer count, total biopsy length, total cancer length in mm (plus per-metric missing flags). 8 components total.
- Unclear biopsies (combined targeted + systematic where PAD does not separate) measure the same set as systematic (cores count, cores with cancer, total biopsy length, total cancer length, plus per-metric missing flags). 8 components total — structurally identical to systematic biopsy.
This shared CodeSystem provides all component codes needed across the three profiles; each profile uses the subset relevant to its source-specific metrics.
NPCR documentation gap rationale: Informationsspecifikation §7 does not provide terminology bindings for biopsy-results variables (same pattern as MR findings, Gleason score). No international code systems (LOINC, SNOMED CT) provide equivalent coverage of this NPCR-specific granularity. This NPCR-internal CodeSystem preserves documentation fidelity by mirroring NPCR Variabelbeskrivning variable structure.
Thesis Discussion note: Unlike Gleason (3 parallel source groups + 1 Summary), BiopsyResults has no equivalent 'summary' concept in NPCR — each biopsy source reports its metrics independently, with no cross-source aggregation in INCA. Therefore the BiopsyResults profiles are 3 source-specific profiles with no Summary Observation counterpart.
- type CodeSystem
- FHIR R4
- status Draft
-
version...
The canonical from this resource does not match any claims.