AMTSBewertung (RiskAssessment)
Profil
| Name | Canonical |
|---|---|
| ISiKAMTSBewertung | https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKAMTSBewertung |
| ISiKAMTSBewertung (RiskAssessment) | I | RiskAssessment | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment Potential outcomes for a subject with likelihood Alternate namesPrognosis DefinitionAn assessment of the likely outcome(s) for a patient or other subject as well as the likelihood of each outcome.
| |
| id | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.id Logical id of this artifact DefinitionThe logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes. The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation. |
| meta | Σ | 0..1 | Meta | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.meta Metadata about the resource DefinitionThe metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.
|
| implicitRules | Σ ?! | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.implicitRules A set of rules under which this content was created DefinitionA reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc. Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.
|
| language | 0..1 | codeBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.language Language of the resource content DefinitionThe base language in which the resource is written. Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute). A human language.
| |
| text | 0..1 | Narrative | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.text Text summary of the resource, for human interpretation Alternate namesnarrative, html, xhtml, display DefinitionA human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety. Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.
| |
| contained | 0..* | Resource | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.contained Contained, inline Resources Alternate namesinline resources, anonymous resources, contained resources DefinitionThese resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope. This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.
| |
| extension | S I | 0..* | Extension | Element idRiskAssessment.extension akzeptiertes (in Kauf genommenes) Risiko Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Hier kann die Begründung und ggf. erforderliche Begleitmaßnahmen für ein in Kauf genommenes Risiko dokumentiert werden. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| acceptedRisk | S I | 0..1 | Extension(string) | Element idRiskAssessment.extension:acceptedRisk Optional Extensions Element Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionOptional Extension Element - found in all resources. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKAcceptedRisk Constraints
|
| modifierExtension | ?! I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.modifierExtension Extensions that cannot be ignored Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| identifier | Σ | 0..* | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.identifier Unique identifier for the assessment DefinitionBusiness identifier assigned to the risk assessment.
|
| basedOn | I | 0..1 | Reference(Resource) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.basedOn Request fulfilled by this assessment DefinitionA reference to the request that is fulfilled by this risk assessment. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
| parent | I | 0..1 | Reference(Resource) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.parent Part of this occurrence DefinitionA reference to a resource that this risk assessment is part of, such as a Procedure. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
| status | S Σ | 1..1 | codeBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.status registered | preliminary | final | amended + DefinitionThe status of the RiskAssessment, using the same statuses as an Observation. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size The status of the risk assessment; e.g. preliminary, final, amended, etc.
|
| method | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.method Evaluation mechanism DefinitionThe algorithm, process or mechanism used to evaluate the risk. The method can influence the results of the assessment. Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination. The mechanism or algorithm used to make the assessment; e.g. TIMI, PRISM, Cardiff Type 2 diabetes, etc.
|
| code | S Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | Element idRiskAssessment.code Art der Risikobeurteilung DefinitionThe type of the risk assessment performed. Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.code.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.code.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| coding | S Σ | 0..* | Coding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.code.coding Code defined by a terminology system DefinitionA reference to a code defined by a terminology system. Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems. Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.code.coding.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.code.coding.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| system | S Σ | 1..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.code.coding.system Identity of the terminology system DefinitionThe identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
|
| version | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.code.coding.version Version of the system - if relevant DefinitionThe version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
|
| code | S Σ | 1..1 | code | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.code.coding.code Symbol in syntax defined by the system DefinitionA symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). Need to refer to a particular code in the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
| display | S Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.code.coding.display Representation defined by the system DefinitionA representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
| userSelected | Σ | 0..1 | boolean | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.code.coding.userSelected If this coding was chosen directly by the user DefinitionIndicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
|
| text | S Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.code.text Plain text representation of the concept DefinitionA human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
|
| subject | S Σ I | 1..1 | Reference(Patient) | Element idRiskAssessment.subject Referenz auf den Patienten DefinitionThe patient or group the risk assessment applies to. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.subject.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.subject.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.subject.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
| type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.subject.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).
|
| identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.subject.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
| display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.subject.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
| encounter | S Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Encounter) | Element idRiskAssessment.encounter Referenz auf den Abteilungskontakt DefinitionThe encounter where the assessment was performed. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.encounter.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.encounter.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.encounter.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
| type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.encounter.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).
|
| identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.encounter.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
| display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.encounter.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
| occurrence[x] | S Σ | 0..1 | Element idRiskAssessment.occurrence[x] Zeitpunkt oder Zeitraum der Beurteilung DefinitionThe date (and possibly time) the risk assessment was performed. The assessment results lose validity the more time elapses from when they are first made. Unordered, Open, by $this(Type) Constraints
| |
| occurrenceDateTime | S Σ | 0..1 | dateTime | Element idRiskAssessment.occurrence[x]:occurrenceDateTime When was assessment made? DefinitionThe date (and possibly time) the risk assessment was performed. The assessment results lose validity the more time elapses from when they are first made.
|
| occurrencePeriod | S Σ | 0..1 | Period | Element idRiskAssessment.occurrence[x]:occurrencePeriod When was assessment made? DefinitionThe date (and possibly time) the risk assessment was performed. The assessment results lose validity the more time elapses from when they are first made.
|
| condition | S Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Condition) | Element idRiskAssessment.condition Bezugsdiagnose (Referenz) DefinitionFor assessments or prognosis specific to a particular condition, indicates the condition being assessed. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.condition.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.condition.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.condition.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
| type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.condition.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).
|
| identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.condition.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
| display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.condition.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
| performer | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Device) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.performer Who did assessment? DefinitionThe provider or software application that performed the assessment. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Reference(Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Device) Constraints
|
| reasonCode | S | 0..* | CodeableConcept | Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode Grund der Risikobewertung (codiert) DefinitionThe reason the risk assessment was performed. Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| coding | S Σ | 0..* | Coding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode.coding Code defined by a terminology system DefinitionA reference to a code defined by a terminology system. Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems. Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode.coding.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode.coding.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| system | S Σ | 1..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode.coding.system Identity of the terminology system DefinitionThe identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
|
| version | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode.coding.version Version of the system - if relevant DefinitionThe version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
|
| code | S Σ | 1..1 | code | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode.coding.code Symbol in syntax defined by the system DefinitionA symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). Need to refer to a particular code in the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
| display | S Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode.coding.display Representation defined by the system DefinitionA representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
| userSelected | Σ | 0..1 | boolean | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode.coding.userSelected If this coding was chosen directly by the user DefinitionIndicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
|
| text | S Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonCode.text Plain text representation of the concept DefinitionA human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
|
| reasonReference | S I | 0..* | Reference(Condition | Observation | DiagnosticReport | DocumentReference) | Element idRiskAssessment.reasonReference Grund der Risikobewertung (Referenz) DefinitionResources supporting the reason the risk assessment was performed. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Reference(Condition | Observation | DiagnosticReport | DocumentReference) Constraints
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonReference.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonReference.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonReference.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
| type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonReference.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).
|
| identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonReference.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
| display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.reasonReference.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
| basis | S I | 0..* | Reference(Resource) | Element idRiskAssessment.basis Entscheidungsgrundlagen der Risikobewertung (Referenz) DefinitionIndicates the source data considered as part of the assessment (for example, FamilyHistory, Observations, Procedures, Conditions, etc.). References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.basis.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.basis.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.basis.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
| type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.basis.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).
|
| identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.basis.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
| display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.basis.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
| prediction | S I | 0..* | BackboneElement | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction Outcome predicted DefinitionDescribes the expected outcome for the subject. Multiple repetitions can be used to identify the same type of outcome in different timeframes as well as different types of outcomes.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| modifierExtension | Σ ?! I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.modifierExtension Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized Alternate namesextensions, user content, modifiers DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
|
| outcome | S | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome Mögliches Outcome für den Patienten DefinitionOne of the potential outcomes for the patient (e.g. remission, death, a particular condition). Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination. The condition or other outcome; e.g. death, remission, amputation, infection, etc.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| coding | S Σ | 0..* | Coding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome.coding Code defined by a terminology system DefinitionA reference to a code defined by a terminology system. Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems. Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome.coding.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome.coding.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| system | S Σ | 1..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome.coding.system Identity of the terminology system DefinitionThe identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
|
| version | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome.coding.version Version of the system - if relevant DefinitionThe version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
|
| code | S Σ | 1..1 | code | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome.coding.code Symbol in syntax defined by the system DefinitionA symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). Need to refer to a particular code in the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
| display | S Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome.coding.display Representation defined by the system DefinitionA representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
| userSelected | Σ | 0..1 | boolean | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome.coding.userSelected If this coding was chosen directly by the user DefinitionIndicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
|
| text | S Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.outcome.text Plain text representation of the concept DefinitionA human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
|
| probability[x] | I | 0..1 | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.probability[x] Likelihood of specified outcome DefinitionIndicates how likely the outcome is (in the specified timeframe). If range is used, it represents the lower and upper bounds of certainty; e.g. 40-60% Decimal values are expressed as percentages as well (max = 100).
| |
| probabilityDecimal | decimal | There are no (further) constraints on this element Data type | ||
| probabilityRange | Range | There are no (further) constraints on this element Data type | ||
| qualitativeRisk | S | 0..1 | CodeableConceptBinding | Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk Risikowahrscheinlichkeit (qualitativ, codiert) DefinitionIndicates how likely the outcome is (in the specified timeframe), expressed as a qualitative value (e.g. low, medium, or high). Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination. The likelihood of the occurrence of a specified outcome.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| coding | S Σ | 0..* | Coding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk.coding Code defined by a terminology system DefinitionA reference to a code defined by a terminology system. Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems. Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
|
| id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk.coding.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
| extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk.coding.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
| system | S Σ | 1..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk.coding.system Identity of the terminology system DefinitionThe identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
|
| version | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk.coding.version Version of the system - if relevant DefinitionThe version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
|
| code | S Σ | 1..1 | code | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk.coding.code Symbol in syntax defined by the system DefinitionA symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). Need to refer to a particular code in the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
| display | S Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk.coding.display Representation defined by the system DefinitionA representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
| userSelected | Σ | 0..1 | boolean | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk.coding.userSelected If this coding was chosen directly by the user DefinitionIndicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
|
| text | S Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk.text Plain text representation of the concept DefinitionA human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
|
| relativeRisk | 0..1 | decimal | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.relativeRisk Relative likelihood DefinitionIndicates the risk for this particular subject (with their specific characteristics) divided by the risk of the population in general. (Numbers greater than 1 = higher risk than the population, numbers less than 1 = lower risk.). Absolute risk is less meaningful than relative risk. Do not use an IEEE type floating point type, instead use something that works like a true decimal, with inbuilt precision (e.g. Java BigInteger)
| |
| when[x] | 0..1 | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.when[x] Timeframe or age range DefinitionIndicates the period of time or age range of the subject to which the specified probability applies. If not specified, the risk applies "over the subject's lifespan".
| ||
| whenPeriod | Period | There are no (further) constraints on this element Data type | ||
| whenRange | Range | There are no (further) constraints on this element Data type | ||
| rationale | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idRiskAssessment.prediction.rationale Explanation of prediction DefinitionAdditional information explaining the basis for the prediction. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
| |
| mitigation | S | 0..1 | string | Element idRiskAssessment.mitigation Hinweis zur Risikovermeidung DefinitionA description of the steps that might be taken to reduce the identified risk(s). One of the main reasons for assessing risks is to identify whether interventional steps are needed to reduce risk. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
| note | S | 0..* | Annotation | Element idRiskAssessment.note Anmerkung zur Risikobewertung DefinitionAdditional comments about the risk assessment. For systems that do not have structured annotations, they can simply communicate a single annotation with no author or time. This element may need to be included in narrative because of the potential for modifying information. Annotations SHOULD NOT be used to communicate "modifying" information that could be computable. (This is a SHOULD because enforcing user behavior is nearly impossible).
|
Terminology Bindings
| Path | Name | Strength | URL |
|---|---|---|---|
| RiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk | risk-probability | extensible | http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/risk-probability |
Anmerkungen zu Must-Support-Feldern
| Feldname | Kurzbeschreibung | Hinweise |
|---|---|---|
| RiskAssessment.extension | akzeptiertes (in Kauf genommenes) Risiko | Hier kann die Begründung und ggf. erforderliche Begleitmaßnahmen für ein in Kauf genommenes Risiko dokumentiert werden. |
| RiskAssessment.code | Art der Risikobeurteilung | |
| RiskAssessment.subject | Referenz auf den Patienten | |
| RiskAssessment.encounter | Referenz auf den Abteilungskontakt | |
| RiskAssessment.occurrence[x] | Zeitpunkt oder Zeitraum der Beurteilung | |
| RiskAssessment.condition | Bezugsdiagnose (Referenz) | |
| RiskAssessment.reasonCode | Grund der Risikobewertung (codiert) | |
| RiskAssessment.reasonReference | Grund der Risikobewertung (Referenz) | |
| RiskAssessment.basis | Entscheidungsgrundlagen der Risikobewertung (Referenz) | |
| RiskAssessment.prediction.outcome | Mögliches Outcome für den Patienten | |
| RiskAssessment.prediction.qualitativeRisk | Risikowahrscheinlichkeit (qualitativ, codiert) | |
| RiskAssessment.mitigation | Hinweis zur Risikovermeidung | |
| RiskAssessment.note | Anmerkung zur Risikobewertung |
Beispiele
Valide Beispiele für das Profil Medikament:
TODO:
{ "resourceType": "RiskAssessment", "id": "ExampleISiKAMTSBewertung1", "meta": { "profile": [ "https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKAMTSBewertung" ] }, "status": "final", "code": { "text": "AMTS Risikobewertung" }, "subject": { "reference": "Patient/PatientinMusterfrau" }, "encounter": { "reference": "Encounter/Fachabteilungskontakt" }, "occurrenceDateTime": "2024-02-20T13:14:32+01:00", "condition": { "reference": "Condition/BehandlungsDiagnoseFreitext" }, "reasonReference": [ { "reference": "DocumentReference/AnamnesebogenScan123456" } ], "basis": [ { "reference": "Observation/Koerpergewicht7777" } ], "prediction": [ { "outcome": { "text": "Niereninsuffizienz" }, "qualitativeRisk": { "coding": [ { "code": "high", "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/risk-probability" } ] } } ], "mitigation": "Substitution der Stalevo Dauermedikation", "note": [ { "text": "Abklärung in der Frühbesprechung am 21.02.2024" } ] }
Interaktionen
Für die Ressource Medication MÜSSEN die REST-Interaktionen "READ", "CREATE" und "UPDATE" implementiert werden.
Folgende Suchparameter sind für das Bestätigungsverfahren relevant, auch in Kombination:
Der Suchparameter "_id" MUSS unterstützt werden:
Beispiele:
GET [base]/RiskAssessment?_id=103270Anwendungshinweise: Weitere Informationen zur Suche nach "_id" finden sich in der FHIR-Basisspezifikation - Abschnitt "Parameters for all resources".
Der verkettete Suchparameter "condition.code" MUSS unterstützt werden:
Beispiele:
GET [base]/RiskAssessment?condition.code=http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm|F71.0Anwendungshinweise: Weitere Informationen zur Suche nach Token-type Parametern finden sich in der FHIR-Basisspezifikation - Abschnitt "Token Search".
Weitere Informationen zur Suche nach verketteten Parametern finden sich in der FHIR-Basisspezifikation - Abschnitt "Chained Parameters".
Der Suchparameter "date" MUSS unterstützt werden:
Beispiele:
GET [base]/RiskAssessment.date=2022-03-21Anwendungshinweise: Weitere Informationen zur Suche nach Date-type Parametern finden sich in der FHIR-Basisspezifikation - Abschnitt "Date".
Der Suchparameter "encounter" MUSS unterstützt werden:
Beispiele:
GET [base]/RiskAssessment?encounter=Encounter/123Anwendungshinweise: Weitere Informationen zur Suche nach Reference-type Parametern finden sich in der FHIR-Basisspezifikation - Abschnitt "Reference Search".
Der verkettete Suchparameter "encounter.identifier" MUSS unterstützt werden:
Beispiele:
GET [base]/RiskAssessment?encounter.identifier=http://mein-krankenhaus.example/fhir/sid/fallnummern|7567867GET [base]/RiskAssessment?encounter.identifier=7567867Anwendungshinweise: Weitere Informationen zur Suche nach Reference-type Parametern finden sich in der FHIR-Basisspezifikation - Abschnitt "Reference Search".
Weitere Informationen zur Suche nach verketteten Parametern finden sich in der FHIR-Basisspezifikation - Abschnitt "Chained Parameters".
Der Suchparameter "patient" MUSS unterstützt werden:
Beispiele:
GET [base]/RiskAssessment?patient=Patient/123Anwendungshinweise: Weitere Informationen zur Suche nach Reference-type Parametern finden sich in der FHIR-Basisspezifikation - Abschnitt "Reference Search".
Der verkettete Suchparameter "patient.identifier" MUSS unterstützt werden:
Beispiele:
GET [base]/RiskAssessment?patient.identifier=http://mein-krankenhaus.example/fhir/sid/patienten|1032702GET [base]/RiskAssessment?patient.identifier=1032702Anwendungshinweise: Weitere Informationen zur Suche nach Token-type Parametern finden sich in der FHIR-Basisspezifikation - Abschnitt "Token Search".
Weitere Informationen zur Suche nach verketteten Parametern finden sich in der FHIR-Basisspezifikation - Abschnitt "Chained Parameters".
Der Suchparameter "risk" MUSS unterstützt werden:
Beispiele:
GET [base]/RiskAssessment.risk=http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/risk-probability|highAnwendungshinweise: Weitere Informationen zur Suche nach Token-type Parametern finden sich in der FHIR-Basisspezifikation - Abschnitt "Token Search".