Releases of the PS-CA Implementation Guide may be found on a table on the Home Page of this Project.
DiagnosticReport (PS-CA)
Additional information on this profile (including the JSON & XML structure and detailed element descriptions) can be found at package/structuredefinition-profile-diagnosticreport-ca-ps.json
Profile
DiagnosticReportPSCA (DiagnosticReport) | I | DiagnosticReport | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport A Diagnostic report - a combination of request information, atomic results, images, interpretation, as well as formatted reports Alternate namesReport, Test, Result, Results, Labs, Laboratory DefinitionThe findings and interpretation of diagnostic tests performed on patients, groups of patients, devices, and locations, and/or specimens derived from these. The report includes clinical context such as requesting and provider information, and some mix of atomic results, images, textual and coded interpretations, and formatted representation of diagnostic reports. This is intended to capture a single report and is not suitable for use in displaying summary information that covers multiple reports. For example, this resource has not been designed for laboratory cumulative reporting formats nor detailed structured reports for sequencing.
| |
id | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.id Logical id of this artifact DefinitionThe logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes. The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation. |
meta | Σ | 0..1 | Meta | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.meta Metadata about the resource DefinitionThe metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.
|
implicitRules | Σ ?! | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.implicitRules A set of rules under which this content was created DefinitionA reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc. Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.
|
language | 0..1 | codeBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.language Language of the resource content DefinitionThe base language in which the resource is written. Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute). A human language.
| |
text | 0..1 | Narrative | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.text Text summary of the resource, for human interpretation Alternate namesnarrative, html, xhtml, display DefinitionA human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety. Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.
| |
contained | 0..* | Resource | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.contained Contained, inline Resources Alternate namesinline resources, anonymous resources, contained resources DefinitionThese resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope. This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.
| |
extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
modifierExtension | ?! I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.modifierExtension Extensions that cannot be ignored Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
identifier | Σ | 0..* | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.identifier Business identifier for report Alternate namesReportID, Filler ID, Placer ID DefinitionIdentifiers assigned to this report by the performer or other systems. Need to know what identifier to use when making queries about this report from the source laboratory, and for linking to the report outside FHIR context. Usually assigned by the Information System of the diagnostic service provider (filler id).
|
basedOn | I | 0..* | Reference(CarePlan | ImmunizationRecommendation | MedicationRequest | NutritionOrder | ServiceRequest) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.basedOn What was requested Alternate namesRequest DefinitionDetails concerning a service requested. This allows tracing of authorization for the report and tracking whether proposals/recommendations were acted upon. Note: Usually there is one test request for each result, however in some circumstances multiple test requests may be represented using a single test result resource. Note that there are also cases where one request leads to multiple reports. Reference(CarePlan | ImmunizationRecommendation | MedicationRequest | NutritionOrder | ServiceRequest) Constraints
|
status | Σ ?! | 1..1 | codeBindingFixed Value | Element idDiagnosticReport.status registered | partial | preliminary | final + DefinitionThe status of the diagnostic report. Diagnostic services routinely issue provisional/incomplete reports, and sometimes withdraw previously released reports. Only diagnostic results with a status of "final" may be included in a patient summary. Feedback is requested on whether this is too restrictive, and, e.g. "registered", "partial" or "preliminary" should also be allowed. The status of the diagnostic report.
final
|
category | S Σ | 1..1 | CodeableConceptPSCA | Element idDiagnosticReport.category Concept - reference to a terminology or just text Alternate namesDepartment, Sub-department, Service, Discipline DefinitionA concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text. The IPS-UV specification considers this a Must Support element with minimum cardinality of 1. Further feedback is required on whether these systems are still expected to be able to demonstrate they can construct this element when developing the patient summary instance Codes for diagnostic service sections.
|
code | S Σ | 1..1 | CodeableConceptPSCA | Element idDiagnosticReport.code Concept - reference to a terminology or just text Alternate namesType DefinitionA concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text. For all CodeableConcepts, at least one of coding or text must be present. If coding contains only a display value (no code) then CodeableConcept must include text. Work is underway to define the pan-Canadian terminology that will be preferred and/or socialized for this element. A stub value set pointing to pCLOCD code system is put forth in the meantime to encourage implementers to utilize the Canadian localization of LOINC
|
subject | S Σ I | 1..1 | Reference(PatientPSCA | Group) | Element idDiagnosticReport.subject The subject of the report - usually, but not always, the patient Alternate namesPatient DefinitionThe subject of the report. Usually, but not always, this is a patient. However, diagnostic services also perform analyses on specimens collected from a variety of other sources. SHALL know the subject context. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Reference(PatientPSCA | Group) Constraints
|
id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.subject.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.subject.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.subject.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.subject.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).
|
identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.subject.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.subject.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
encounter | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Encounter) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.encounter Health care event when test ordered Alternate namesContext DefinitionThe healthcare event (e.g. a patient and healthcare provider interaction) which this DiagnosticReport is about. Links the request to the Encounter context. This will typically be the encounter the event occurred within, but some events may be initiated prior to or after the official completion of an encounter but still be tied to the context of the encounter (e.g. pre-admission laboratory tests).
|
effective[x] | S Σ | 1..1 | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.effective[x] Clinically relevant time/time-period for report Alternate namesObservation time, Effective Time, Occurrence DefinitionThe time or time-period the observed values are related to. When the subject of the report is a patient, this is usually either the time of the procedure or of specimen collection(s), but very often the source of the date/time is not known, only the date/time itself. Need to know where in the patient history to file/present this report. If the diagnostic procedure was performed on the patient, this is the time it was performed. If there are specimens, the diagnostically relevant time can be derived from the specimen collection times, but the specimen information is not always available, and the exact relationship between the specimens and the diagnostically relevant time is not always automatic.
| |
id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.effective[x].id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
extension | I | 0..* | Extension | Element idDiagnosticReport.effective[x].extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
data-absent-reason | S I | 0..1 | Extension(code) | Element idDiagnosticReport.effective[x].extension:data-absent-reason effective[x] absence reason Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionProvides a reason why the effectiveTime is missing. Systems that have requirements to always populate .effective[X] do not need to demonstrate this element. Receiving systems are expected not to error if they receive a patient summary with a data absent reason on this element. http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason Constraints
|
effectiveDateTime | dateTime | There are no (further) constraints on this element Data type | ||
effectivePeriod | Period | There are no (further) constraints on this element Data type | ||
issued | Σ | 0..1 | instant | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.issued DateTime this version was made Alternate namesDate published, Date Issued, Date Verified DefinitionThe date and time that this version of the report was made available to providers, typically after the report was reviewed and verified. Clinicians need to be able to check the date that the report was released. May be different from the update time of the resource itself, because that is the status of the record (potentially a secondary copy), not the actual release time of the report.
|
performer | S Σ I | 0..* | Reference(PractitionerLabPSCA | PractitionerRoleLabPSCA | OrganizationLabPSCA | CareTeam) | Element idDiagnosticReport.performer Responsible Diagnostic Service Alternate namesLaboratory, Service, Practitioner, Department, Company, Authorized by, Director DefinitionThe diagnostic service that is responsible for issuing the report. Need to know whom to contact if there are queries about the results. Also may need to track the source of reports for secondary data analysis. The IPS-UV specification considers this a Must Support element. Further feedback is required on whether these systems are still expected to be able to demonstrate they can construct this element when developing the patient summary instance Reference(PractitionerLabPSCA | PractitionerRoleLabPSCA | OrganizationLabPSCA | CareTeam) Constraints
|
resultsInterpreter | Σ I | 0..* | Reference(Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Organization | CareTeam) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.resultsInterpreter Primary result interpreter Alternate namesAnalyzed by, Reported by DefinitionThe practitioner or organization that is responsible for the report's conclusions and interpretations. Need to know whom to contact if there are queries about the results. Also may need to track the source of reports for secondary data analysis. Might not be the same entity that takes responsibility for the clinical report. Reference(Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Organization | CareTeam) Constraints
|
specimen | I | 0..* | Reference(Specimen) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.specimen Specimens this report is based on DefinitionDetails about the specimens on which this diagnostic report is based. Need to be able to report information about the collected specimens on which the report is based. If the specimen is sufficiently specified with a code in the test result name, then this additional data may be redundant. If there are multiple specimens, these may be represented per observation or group.
|
result | S I | 0..* | Reference(Observation) | Element idDiagnosticReport.result Observation results included in the diagnostic report. Alternate namesData, Atomic Value, Result, Atomic result, Data, Test, Analyte, Battery, Organizer DefinitionObservation results included in the diagnostic report. Need to support individual results, or groups of results, where the result grouping is arbitrary, but meaningful. The IPS-UV specification considers this a Must Support element. Further feedback is required on whether these systems are still expected to be able to demonstrate they can construct this element when developing the patient summary instance Unordered, Open, by $this.resolve()(Profile) Constraints
|
observation-results | S I | 0..* | Reference(ObservationResultsLaboratoryPathologyPSCA | ObservationResultsRadiologyPSCA) | Element idDiagnosticReport.result:observation-results Observations Alternate namesData, Atomic Value, Result, Atomic result, Data, Test, Analyte, Battery, Organizer DefinitionObservations that are part of this diagnostic report. Need to support individual results, or groups of results, where the result grouping is arbitrary, but meaningful. Observations can contain observations. Reference(ObservationResultsLaboratoryPathologyPSCA | ObservationResultsRadiologyPSCA) Constraints
|
imagingStudy | I | 0..* | Reference(ImagingStudy) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.imagingStudy Reference to full details of imaging associated with the diagnostic report DefinitionOne or more links to full details of any imaging performed during the diagnostic investigation. Typically, this is imaging performed by DICOM enabled modalities, but this is not required. A fully enabled PACS viewer can use this information to provide views of the source images. ImagingStudy and the image element are somewhat overlapping - typically, the list of image references in the image element will also be found in one of the imaging study resources. However, each caters to different types of displays for different types of purposes. Neither, either, or both may be provided.
|
media | Σ | 0..* | BackboneElement | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.media Key images associated with this report Alternate namesDICOM, Slides, Scans DefinitionA list of key images associated with this report. The images are generally created during the diagnostic process, and may be directly of the patient, or of treated specimens (i.e. slides of interest). Many diagnostic services include images in the report as part of their service.
|
id | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.media.id Unique id for inter-element referencing DefinitionUnique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
| |
extension | I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.media.extension Additional content defined by implementations Alternate namesextensions, user content DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. Unordered, Open, by url(Value) Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url Constraints
|
modifierExtension | Σ ?! I | 0..* | Extension | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.media.modifierExtension Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized Alternate namesextensions, user content, modifiers DefinitionMay be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself). Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions. There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
|
comment | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.media.comment Comment about the image (e.g. explanation) DefinitionA comment about the image. Typically, this is used to provide an explanation for why the image is included, or to draw the viewer's attention to important features. The provider of the report should make a comment about each image included in the report. The comment should be displayed with the image. It would be common for the report to include additional discussion of the image contents in other sections such as the conclusion.
| |
link | Σ I | 1..1 | Reference(Media) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.media.link Reference to the image source DefinitionReference to the image source. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
conclusion | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.conclusion Clinical conclusion (interpretation) of test results Alternate namesReport DefinitionConcise and clinically contextualized summary conclusion (interpretation/impression) of the diagnostic report. Need to be able to provide a conclusion that is not lost among the basic result data. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
| |
conclusionCode | 0..* | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.conclusionCode Codes for the clinical conclusion of test results DefinitionOne or more codes that represent the summary conclusion (interpretation/impression) of the diagnostic report. Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination. Diagnosis codes provided as adjuncts to the report.
| |
presentedForm | I | 0..* | Attachment | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element idDiagnosticReport.presentedForm Entire report as issued DefinitionRich text representation of the entire result as issued by the diagnostic service. Multiple formats are allowed but they SHALL be semantically equivalent. Gives laboratory the ability to provide its own fully formatted report for clinical fidelity. "application/pdf" is recommended as the most reliable and interoperable in this context.
|
Extensions
There are no additional extensions added to this profile
Key Differences between the IPS-UV and PS-CA
Must Support Differences:
There are no Must support differences between this profile and IPS-UV
Cardinality Differences:
There are no cardinality differences between this profile and IPS-UV
Vocabulary Differences:
There are no vocabulary differences between this profile and IPS-UV
Other differences between the IPS and PS-CA Include:
- Data type profiles (e.g., CodeableConcept) and reference targets (e.g., Patient) replaced with PS-CA equivalents when appropriate