FHIR Artifacts > Structure Definition: Communication Profile
Structure Definition: Communication Profile
Canonical URL:http://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/StructureDefinition/ca-on-eReferral-profile-Communication
Simplifier project page:
Derived from: Communication(R4)
Formal Views of Profile Content
Description of Profiles, Differentials, Snapshots and how the different presentations work
Differential View
Communication | I | Communication | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication A record of information transmitted from a sender to a receiver DefinitionAn occurrence of information being transmitted; e.g. an alert that was sent to a responsible provider, a public health agency that was notified about a reportable condition.
| |
meta | S Σ | 1..1 | Meta | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta Metadata about the resource DefinitionThe metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.
|
versionId | Σ | 0..1 | id | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.versionId Version specific identifier DefinitionThe version specific identifier, as it appears in the version portion of the URL. This value changes when the resource is created, updated, or deleted. The server assigns this value, and ignores what the client specifies, except in the case that the server is imposing version integrity on updates/deletes.
|
lastUpdated | Σ | 0..1 | instant | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.lastUpdated When the resource version last changed DefinitionWhen the resource last changed - e.g. when the version changed. This value is always populated except when the resource is first being created. The server / resource manager sets this value; what a client provides is irrelevant. This is equivalent to the HTTP Last-Modified and SHOULD have the same value on a read interaction.
|
source | Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.source Identifies where the resource comes from DefinitionA uri that identifies the source system of the resource. This provides a minimal amount of Provenance information that can be used to track or differentiate the source of information in the resource. The source may identify another FHIR server, document, message, database, etc. In the provenance resource, this corresponds to Provenance.entity.what[x]. The exact use of the source (and the implied Provenance.entity.role) is left to implementer discretion. Only one nominated source is allowed; for additional provenance details, a full Provenance resource should be used. This element can be used to indicate where the current master source of a resource that has a canonical URL if the resource is no longer hosted at the canonical URL.
|
profile | S Σ | 1..* | canonical(StructureDefinition) | Element IdCommunication.meta.profile Profiles this resource claims to conform to DefinitionA list of profiles (references to StructureDefinition resources) that this resource claims to conform to. The URL is a reference to StructureDefinition.url.
|
security | Σ | 0..* | CodingBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.security Security Labels applied to this resource DefinitionSecurity labels applied to this resource. These tags connect specific resources to the overall security policy and infrastructure. The security labels can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of security labels is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored. Security Labels from the Healthcare Privacy and Security Classification System. All Security Labels (extensible)Constraints
|
tag | Σ | 0..* | Coding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.tag Tags applied to this resource DefinitionTags applied to this resource. Tags are intended to be used to identify and relate resources to process and workflow, and applications are not required to consider the tags when interpreting the meaning of a resource. The tags can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of tags is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored. Codes that represent various types of tags, commonly workflow-related; e.g. "Needs review by Dr. Jones". CommonTags (example)Constraints
|
identifier | S Σ | 0..* | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier Unique identifier DefinitionBusiness identifiers assigned to this communication by the performer or other systems which remain constant as the resource is updated and propagates from server to server. Allows identification of the communication as it is known by various participating systems and in a way that remains consistent across servers. This is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion). It is best practice for the identifier to only appear on a single resource instance, however business practices may occasionally dictate that multiple resource instances with the same identifier can exist - possibly even with different resource types. For example, multiple Patient and a Person resource instance might share the same social insurance number.
|
use | Σ ?! | 0..1 | codeBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.use usual | official | temp | secondary | old (If known) DefinitionThe purpose of this identifier. Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers. Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary. Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known . IdentifierUse (required)Constraints
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConceptBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.type Description of identifier DefinitionA coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose. Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known. This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type. A coded type for an identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose. Identifier Type Codes (extensible)Constraints
|
system | S Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.system The namespace for the identifier value DefinitionEstablishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique. There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers. Identifier.system is always case sensitive.
General http://www.acme.com/identifiers/patient Mappings
|
value | S Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.value The value that is unique DefinitionThe portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system. If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
General 123456 Mappings
|
period | Σ I | 0..1 | Period | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.period Time period when id is/was valid for use DefinitionTime period during which identifier is/was valid for use. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). Period is not used for a duration (a measure of elapsed time). See Duration.
|
assigner | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Organization) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.assigner Organization that issued id (may be just text) DefinitionOrganization that issued/manages the identifier. The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
|
instantiatesCanonical | Σ | 0..1 | canonical(PlanDefinition | ActivityDefinition | Measure | OperationDefinition | Questionnaire) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.instantiatesCanonical Instantiates FHIR protocol or definition DefinitionThe URL pointing to a FHIR-defined protocol, guideline, orderset or other definition that is adhered to in whole or in part by this Communication. canonical(PlanDefinition | ActivityDefinition | Measure | OperationDefinition | Questionnaire) Constraints
|
instantiatesUri | Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.instantiatesUri Instantiates external protocol or definition DefinitionThe URL pointing to an externally maintained protocol, guideline, orderset or other definition that is adhered to in whole or in part by this Communication. This might be an HTML page, PDF, etc. or could just be a non-resolvable URI identifier.
|
basedOn | S Σ I | 0..* | Reference(ServiceRequest) | Element IdCommunication.basedOn Request fulfilled by this communication Alternate namesfulfills DefinitionAn order, proposal or plan fulfilled in whole or in part by this Communication. This must point to some sort of a 'Request' resource, such as CarePlan, CommunicationRequest, ServiceRequest, MedicationRequest, etc. Allowed aggregation: referenced Constraints
|
reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model). ResourceType (extensible)Constraints
|
identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
partOf | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Resource) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.partOf Part of this action Alternate namescontainer DefinitionPart of this action. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
inResponseTo | S I | 0..* | Reference(Communication) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.inResponseTo Reply to DefinitionPrior communication that this communication is in response to. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
status | S Σ ?! | 1..1 | codeBindingFixed Value | Element IdCommunication.status preparation | in-progress | not-done | on-hold | stopped | completed | entered-in-error | unknown DefinitionThe status of the transmission. This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains the codes aborted and entered-in-error that mark the communication as not currently valid. The status of the communication. EventStatus (required)Constraints
completed
|
statusReason | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.statusReason Reason for current status Alternate namesSuspended Reason, Cancelled Reason DefinitionCaptures the reason for the current state of the Communication. This is generally only used for "exception" statuses such as "not-done", "suspended" or "aborted". The reason for performing the event at all is captured in reasonCode, not here. Codes for the reason why a communication did not happen. CommunicationNotDoneReason (example)Constraints
|
category | S | 0..* | CodeableConceptBinding | Element IdCommunication.category Message category DefinitionThe type of message conveyed such as alert, notification, reminder, instruction, etc. There may be multiple axes of categorization and one communication may serve multiple purposes. Codes for general categories of communications such as alerts, instructions, etc. CommunicationCategory (extensible)Constraints
|
coding | S Σ | 0..* | CodingBinding | Element IdCommunication.category.coding Code defined by a terminology system DefinitionA reference to a code defined by a terminology system. Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems. Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true. CommunicationCategory (extensible) Constraints
|
system | S Σ | 1..1 | uriFixed Value | Element IdCommunication.category.coding.system Identity of the terminology system DefinitionThe identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
https://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/CodeSystem/communication-category
|
version | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.version Version of the system - if relevant DefinitionThe version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
|
code | S Σ | 1..1 | code | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.code Symbol in syntax defined by the system DefinitionA symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). Need to refer to a particular code in the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
display | S Σ | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.display Representation defined by the system DefinitionA representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
userSelected | Σ | 0..1 | boolean | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.userSelected If this coding was chosen directly by the user DefinitionIndicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
|
text | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.text Plain text representation of the concept DefinitionA human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
|
priority | Σ | 0..1 | codeBinding | Element IdCommunication.priority routine | urgent | asap | stat DefinitionCharacterizes how quickly the planned or in progress communication must be addressed. Includes concepts such as stat, urgent, routine. Used to prioritize workflow (such as which communication to read first) when the communication is planned or in progress. If missing, this communication should be treated with normal priority Codes indicating the relative importance of a communication. RequestPriority (required)Constraints
|
medium | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.medium A channel of communication DefinitionA channel that was used for this communication (e.g. email, fax). Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination. Codes for communication mediums such as phone, fax, email, in person, etc. v3.ParticipationMode (example)Constraints
| |
subject | S Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Patient) | Element IdCommunication.subject Focus of message Alternate namespatient DefinitionThe patient or group that was the focus of this communication. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Allowed aggregation: referenced Constraints
|
reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model). ResourceType (extensible)Constraints
|
identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
topic | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic Description of the purpose/content DefinitionDescription of the purpose/content, similar to a subject line in an email. Communication.topic.text can be used without any codings. Codes describing the purpose or content of the communication. CommunicationTopic (example)Constraints
| |
coding | Σ | 0..* | Coding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding Code defined by a terminology system DefinitionA reference to a code defined by a terminology system. Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems. Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
|
system | Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.system Identity of the terminology system DefinitionThe identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
|
version | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.version Version of the system - if relevant DefinitionThe version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
|
code | Σ | 0..0 | code | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.code Symbol in syntax defined by the system DefinitionA symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). Need to refer to a particular code in the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.display Representation defined by the system DefinitionA representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
userSelected | Σ | 0..0 | boolean | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.userSelected If this coding was chosen directly by the user DefinitionIndicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
|
text | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.text Plain text representation of the concept DefinitionA human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
|
about | I | 0..1 | Reference(Resource) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.about Resources that pertain to this communication DefinitionOther resources that pertain to this communication and to which this communication should be associated. Don't use Communication.about element when a more specific element exists, such as basedOn or reasonReference.
|
encounter | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Encounter) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.encounter Encounter created as part of DefinitionThe Encounter during which this Communication was created or to which the creation of this record is tightly associated. This will typically be the encounter the event occurred within, but some activities may be initiated prior to or after the official completion of an encounter but still be tied to the context of the encounter.
|
sent | S | 0..1 | dateTime | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sent When sent DefinitionThe time when this communication was sent.
|
received | 0..1 | dateTime | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.received When received DefinitionThe time when this communication arrived at the destination.
| |
recipient | I | 0..* | Reference(Organization | Patient | Practitioner | PractitionerRole | HealthcareService) | Element IdCommunication.recipient Message recipient DefinitionThe entity (e.g. person, organization, clinical information system, care team or device) which was the target of the communication. If receipts need to be tracked by an individual, a separate resource instance will need to be created for each recipient. Multiple recipient communications are intended where either receipts are not tracked (e.g. a mass mail-out) or a receipt is captured in aggregate (all emails confirmed received by a particular time). References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Reference(Organization | Patient | Practitioner | PractitionerRole | HealthcareService) Constraints
|
sender | S I | 0..1 | Reference(PractitionerRole) | Element IdCommunication.sender Message sender DefinitionThe entity (e.g. person, organization, clinical information system, or device) which was the source of the communication. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Allowed aggregation: referenced Constraints
|
reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model). ResourceType (extensible)Constraints
|
identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
reasonCode | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.reasonCode Indication for message DefinitionThe reason or justification for the communication. Textual reasons can be captured using reasonCode.text. Codes for describing reasons for the occurrence of a communication. SNOMEDCTClinicalFindings (example)Constraints
|
reasonReference | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Condition | Observation | DiagnosticReport | DocumentReference) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.reasonReference Why was communication done? DefinitionIndicates another resource whose existence justifies this communication. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Reference(Condition | Observation | DiagnosticReport | DocumentReference) Constraints
|
payload | S | 0..* | BackboneElement | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.payload Message payload DefinitionText, attachment(s), or resource(s) that was communicated to the recipient.
|
content[x] | 1..1 | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.payload.content[x] Message part content DefinitionA communicated content (or for multi-part communications, one portion of the communication).
| ||
contentString | string | Data Type | ||
contentAttachment | Attachment | Data Type | ||
note | 0..* | Annotation | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note Comments made about the communication DefinitionAdditional notes or commentary about the communication by the sender, receiver or other interested parties. For systems that do not have structured annotations, they can simply communicate a single annotation with no author or time. This element may need to be included in narrative because of the potential for modifying information. Annotations SHOULD NOT be used to communicate "modifying" information that could be computable. (This is a SHOULD because enforcing user behavior is nearly impossible).
| |
author[x] | Σ | 0..1 | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note.author[x] Individual responsible for the annotation DefinitionThe individual responsible for making the annotation. Organization is used when there's no need for specific attribution as to who made the comment.
| |
authorString | string | Data Type | ||
time | Σ | 0..1 | dateTime | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note.time When the annotation was made DefinitionIndicates when this particular annotation was made.
|
text | Σ | 1..1 | markdown | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note.text The annotation - text content (as markdown) DefinitionThe text of the annotation in markdown format. Systems are not required to have markdown support, so the text should be readable without markdown processing. The markdown syntax is GFM - see https://github.github.com/gfm/
|
Hybrid View
Communication | I | Communication | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication A record of information transmitted from a sender to a receiver DefinitionAn occurrence of information being transmitted; e.g. an alert that was sent to a responsible provider, a public health agency that was notified about a reportable condition.
| |
meta | S Σ | 1..1 | Meta | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta Metadata about the resource DefinitionThe metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.
|
versionId | Σ | 0..1 | id | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.versionId Version specific identifier DefinitionThe version specific identifier, as it appears in the version portion of the URL. This value changes when the resource is created, updated, or deleted. The server assigns this value, and ignores what the client specifies, except in the case that the server is imposing version integrity on updates/deletes.
|
lastUpdated | Σ | 0..1 | instant | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.lastUpdated When the resource version last changed DefinitionWhen the resource last changed - e.g. when the version changed. This value is always populated except when the resource is first being created. The server / resource manager sets this value; what a client provides is irrelevant. This is equivalent to the HTTP Last-Modified and SHOULD have the same value on a read interaction.
|
source | Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.source Identifies where the resource comes from DefinitionA uri that identifies the source system of the resource. This provides a minimal amount of Provenance information that can be used to track or differentiate the source of information in the resource. The source may identify another FHIR server, document, message, database, etc. In the provenance resource, this corresponds to Provenance.entity.what[x]. The exact use of the source (and the implied Provenance.entity.role) is left to implementer discretion. Only one nominated source is allowed; for additional provenance details, a full Provenance resource should be used. This element can be used to indicate where the current master source of a resource that has a canonical URL if the resource is no longer hosted at the canonical URL.
|
profile | S Σ | 1..* | canonical(StructureDefinition) | Element IdCommunication.meta.profile Profiles this resource claims to conform to DefinitionA list of profiles (references to StructureDefinition resources) that this resource claims to conform to. The URL is a reference to StructureDefinition.url.
|
security | Σ | 0..* | CodingBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.security Security Labels applied to this resource DefinitionSecurity labels applied to this resource. These tags connect specific resources to the overall security policy and infrastructure. The security labels can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of security labels is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored. Security Labels from the Healthcare Privacy and Security Classification System. All Security Labels (extensible)Constraints
|
tag | Σ | 0..* | Coding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.tag Tags applied to this resource DefinitionTags applied to this resource. Tags are intended to be used to identify and relate resources to process and workflow, and applications are not required to consider the tags when interpreting the meaning of a resource. The tags can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of tags is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored. Codes that represent various types of tags, commonly workflow-related; e.g. "Needs review by Dr. Jones". CommonTags (example)Constraints
|
identifier | S Σ | 0..* | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier Unique identifier DefinitionBusiness identifiers assigned to this communication by the performer or other systems which remain constant as the resource is updated and propagates from server to server. Allows identification of the communication as it is known by various participating systems and in a way that remains consistent across servers. This is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion). It is best practice for the identifier to only appear on a single resource instance, however business practices may occasionally dictate that multiple resource instances with the same identifier can exist - possibly even with different resource types. For example, multiple Patient and a Person resource instance might share the same social insurance number.
|
use | Σ ?! | 0..1 | codeBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.use usual | official | temp | secondary | old (If known) DefinitionThe purpose of this identifier. Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers. Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary. Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known . IdentifierUse (required)Constraints
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConceptBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.type Description of identifier DefinitionA coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose. Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known. This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type. A coded type for an identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose. Identifier Type Codes (extensible)Constraints
|
system | S Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.system The namespace for the identifier value DefinitionEstablishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique. There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers. Identifier.system is always case sensitive.
General http://www.acme.com/identifiers/patient Mappings
|
value | S Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.value The value that is unique DefinitionThe portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system. If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
General 123456 Mappings
|
period | Σ I | 0..1 | Period | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.period Time period when id is/was valid for use DefinitionTime period during which identifier is/was valid for use. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). Period is not used for a duration (a measure of elapsed time). See Duration.
|
assigner | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Organization) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.assigner Organization that issued id (may be just text) DefinitionOrganization that issued/manages the identifier. The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
|
instantiatesCanonical | Σ | 0..1 | canonical(PlanDefinition | ActivityDefinition | Measure | OperationDefinition | Questionnaire) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.instantiatesCanonical Instantiates FHIR protocol or definition DefinitionThe URL pointing to a FHIR-defined protocol, guideline, orderset or other definition that is adhered to in whole or in part by this Communication. canonical(PlanDefinition | ActivityDefinition | Measure | OperationDefinition | Questionnaire) Constraints
|
instantiatesUri | Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.instantiatesUri Instantiates external protocol or definition DefinitionThe URL pointing to an externally maintained protocol, guideline, orderset or other definition that is adhered to in whole or in part by this Communication. This might be an HTML page, PDF, etc. or could just be a non-resolvable URI identifier.
|
basedOn | S Σ I | 0..* | Reference(ServiceRequest) | Element IdCommunication.basedOn Request fulfilled by this communication Alternate namesfulfills DefinitionAn order, proposal or plan fulfilled in whole or in part by this Communication. This must point to some sort of a 'Request' resource, such as CarePlan, CommunicationRequest, ServiceRequest, MedicationRequest, etc. Allowed aggregation: referenced Constraints
|
reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model). ResourceType (extensible)Constraints
|
identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
partOf | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Resource) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.partOf Part of this action Alternate namescontainer DefinitionPart of this action. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
inResponseTo | S I | 0..* | Reference(Communication) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.inResponseTo Reply to DefinitionPrior communication that this communication is in response to. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
status | S Σ ?! | 1..1 | codeBindingFixed Value | Element IdCommunication.status preparation | in-progress | not-done | on-hold | stopped | completed | entered-in-error | unknown DefinitionThe status of the transmission. This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains the codes aborted and entered-in-error that mark the communication as not currently valid. The status of the communication. EventStatus (required)Constraints
completed
|
statusReason | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.statusReason Reason for current status Alternate namesSuspended Reason, Cancelled Reason DefinitionCaptures the reason for the current state of the Communication. This is generally only used for "exception" statuses such as "not-done", "suspended" or "aborted". The reason for performing the event at all is captured in reasonCode, not here. Codes for the reason why a communication did not happen. CommunicationNotDoneReason (example)Constraints
|
category | S | 0..* | CodeableConceptBinding | Element IdCommunication.category Message category DefinitionThe type of message conveyed such as alert, notification, reminder, instruction, etc. There may be multiple axes of categorization and one communication may serve multiple purposes. Codes for general categories of communications such as alerts, instructions, etc. CommunicationCategory (extensible)Constraints
|
coding | S Σ | 0..* | CodingBinding | Element IdCommunication.category.coding Code defined by a terminology system DefinitionA reference to a code defined by a terminology system. Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems. Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true. CommunicationCategory (extensible) Constraints
|
system | S Σ | 1..1 | uriFixed Value | Element IdCommunication.category.coding.system Identity of the terminology system DefinitionThe identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
https://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/CodeSystem/communication-category
|
version | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.version Version of the system - if relevant DefinitionThe version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
|
code | S Σ | 1..1 | code | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.code Symbol in syntax defined by the system DefinitionA symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). Need to refer to a particular code in the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
display | S Σ | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.display Representation defined by the system DefinitionA representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
userSelected | Σ | 0..1 | boolean | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.userSelected If this coding was chosen directly by the user DefinitionIndicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
|
text | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.text Plain text representation of the concept DefinitionA human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
|
priority | Σ | 0..1 | codeBinding | Element IdCommunication.priority routine | urgent | asap | stat DefinitionCharacterizes how quickly the planned or in progress communication must be addressed. Includes concepts such as stat, urgent, routine. Used to prioritize workflow (such as which communication to read first) when the communication is planned or in progress. If missing, this communication should be treated with normal priority Codes indicating the relative importance of a communication. RequestPriority (required)Constraints
|
medium | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.medium A channel of communication DefinitionA channel that was used for this communication (e.g. email, fax). Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination. Codes for communication mediums such as phone, fax, email, in person, etc. v3.ParticipationMode (example)Constraints
| |
subject | S Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Patient) | Element IdCommunication.subject Focus of message Alternate namespatient DefinitionThe patient or group that was the focus of this communication. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Allowed aggregation: referenced Constraints
|
reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model). ResourceType (extensible)Constraints
|
identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
topic | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic Description of the purpose/content DefinitionDescription of the purpose/content, similar to a subject line in an email. Communication.topic.text can be used without any codings. Codes describing the purpose or content of the communication. CommunicationTopic (example)Constraints
| |
coding | Σ | 0..* | Coding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding Code defined by a terminology system DefinitionA reference to a code defined by a terminology system. Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems. Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
|
system | Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.system Identity of the terminology system DefinitionThe identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
|
version | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.version Version of the system - if relevant DefinitionThe version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
|
code | Σ | 0..0 | code | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.code Symbol in syntax defined by the system DefinitionA symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). Need to refer to a particular code in the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.display Representation defined by the system DefinitionA representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
userSelected | Σ | 0..0 | boolean | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.userSelected If this coding was chosen directly by the user DefinitionIndicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
|
text | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.text Plain text representation of the concept DefinitionA human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
|
about | I | 0..1 | Reference(Resource) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.about Resources that pertain to this communication DefinitionOther resources that pertain to this communication and to which this communication should be associated. Don't use Communication.about element when a more specific element exists, such as basedOn or reasonReference.
|
encounter | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Encounter) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.encounter Encounter created as part of DefinitionThe Encounter during which this Communication was created or to which the creation of this record is tightly associated. This will typically be the encounter the event occurred within, but some activities may be initiated prior to or after the official completion of an encounter but still be tied to the context of the encounter.
|
sent | S | 0..1 | dateTime | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sent When sent DefinitionThe time when this communication was sent.
|
received | 0..1 | dateTime | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.received When received DefinitionThe time when this communication arrived at the destination.
| |
recipient | I | 0..* | Reference(Organization | Patient | Practitioner | PractitionerRole | HealthcareService) | Element IdCommunication.recipient Message recipient DefinitionThe entity (e.g. person, organization, clinical information system, care team or device) which was the target of the communication. If receipts need to be tracked by an individual, a separate resource instance will need to be created for each recipient. Multiple recipient communications are intended where either receipts are not tracked (e.g. a mass mail-out) or a receipt is captured in aggregate (all emails confirmed received by a particular time). References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Reference(Organization | Patient | Practitioner | PractitionerRole | HealthcareService) Constraints
|
sender | S I | 0..1 | Reference(PractitionerRole) | Element IdCommunication.sender Message sender DefinitionThe entity (e.g. person, organization, clinical information system, or device) which was the source of the communication. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Allowed aggregation: referenced Constraints
|
reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model). ResourceType (extensible)Constraints
|
identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
reasonCode | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.reasonCode Indication for message DefinitionThe reason or justification for the communication. Textual reasons can be captured using reasonCode.text. Codes for describing reasons for the occurrence of a communication. SNOMEDCTClinicalFindings (example)Constraints
|
reasonReference | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Condition | Observation | DiagnosticReport | DocumentReference) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.reasonReference Why was communication done? DefinitionIndicates another resource whose existence justifies this communication. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Reference(Condition | Observation | DiagnosticReport | DocumentReference) Constraints
|
payload | S | 0..* | BackboneElement | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.payload Message payload DefinitionText, attachment(s), or resource(s) that was communicated to the recipient.
|
content[x] | 1..1 | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.payload.content[x] Message part content DefinitionA communicated content (or for multi-part communications, one portion of the communication).
| ||
contentString | string | Data Type | ||
contentAttachment | Attachment | Data Type | ||
note | 0..* | Annotation | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note Comments made about the communication DefinitionAdditional notes or commentary about the communication by the sender, receiver or other interested parties. For systems that do not have structured annotations, they can simply communicate a single annotation with no author or time. This element may need to be included in narrative because of the potential for modifying information. Annotations SHOULD NOT be used to communicate "modifying" information that could be computable. (This is a SHOULD because enforcing user behavior is nearly impossible).
| |
author[x] | Σ | 0..1 | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note.author[x] Individual responsible for the annotation DefinitionThe individual responsible for making the annotation. Organization is used when there's no need for specific attribution as to who made the comment.
| |
authorString | string | Data Type | ||
time | Σ | 0..1 | dateTime | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note.time When the annotation was made DefinitionIndicates when this particular annotation was made.
|
text | Σ | 1..1 | markdown | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note.text The annotation - text content (as markdown) DefinitionThe text of the annotation in markdown format. Systems are not required to have markdown support, so the text should be readable without markdown processing. The markdown syntax is GFM - see https://github.github.com/gfm/
|
Snapshot View
Communication | I | Communication | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication A record of information transmitted from a sender to a receiver DefinitionAn occurrence of information being transmitted; e.g. an alert that was sent to a responsible provider, a public health agency that was notified about a reportable condition.
| |
meta | S Σ | 1..1 | Meta | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta Metadata about the resource DefinitionThe metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.
|
versionId | Σ | 0..1 | id | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.versionId Version specific identifier DefinitionThe version specific identifier, as it appears in the version portion of the URL. This value changes when the resource is created, updated, or deleted. The server assigns this value, and ignores what the client specifies, except in the case that the server is imposing version integrity on updates/deletes.
|
lastUpdated | Σ | 0..1 | instant | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.lastUpdated When the resource version last changed DefinitionWhen the resource last changed - e.g. when the version changed. This value is always populated except when the resource is first being created. The server / resource manager sets this value; what a client provides is irrelevant. This is equivalent to the HTTP Last-Modified and SHOULD have the same value on a read interaction.
|
source | Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.source Identifies where the resource comes from DefinitionA uri that identifies the source system of the resource. This provides a minimal amount of Provenance information that can be used to track or differentiate the source of information in the resource. The source may identify another FHIR server, document, message, database, etc. In the provenance resource, this corresponds to Provenance.entity.what[x]. The exact use of the source (and the implied Provenance.entity.role) is left to implementer discretion. Only one nominated source is allowed; for additional provenance details, a full Provenance resource should be used. This element can be used to indicate where the current master source of a resource that has a canonical URL if the resource is no longer hosted at the canonical URL.
|
profile | S Σ | 1..* | canonical(StructureDefinition) | Element IdCommunication.meta.profile Profiles this resource claims to conform to DefinitionA list of profiles (references to StructureDefinition resources) that this resource claims to conform to. The URL is a reference to StructureDefinition.url.
|
security | Σ | 0..* | CodingBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.security Security Labels applied to this resource DefinitionSecurity labels applied to this resource. These tags connect specific resources to the overall security policy and infrastructure. The security labels can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of security labels is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored. Security Labels from the Healthcare Privacy and Security Classification System. All Security Labels (extensible)Constraints
|
tag | Σ | 0..* | Coding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.meta.tag Tags applied to this resource DefinitionTags applied to this resource. Tags are intended to be used to identify and relate resources to process and workflow, and applications are not required to consider the tags when interpreting the meaning of a resource. The tags can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of tags is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored. Codes that represent various types of tags, commonly workflow-related; e.g. "Needs review by Dr. Jones". CommonTags (example)Constraints
|
identifier | S Σ | 0..* | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier Unique identifier DefinitionBusiness identifiers assigned to this communication by the performer or other systems which remain constant as the resource is updated and propagates from server to server. Allows identification of the communication as it is known by various participating systems and in a way that remains consistent across servers. This is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion). It is best practice for the identifier to only appear on a single resource instance, however business practices may occasionally dictate that multiple resource instances with the same identifier can exist - possibly even with different resource types. For example, multiple Patient and a Person resource instance might share the same social insurance number.
|
use | Σ ?! | 0..1 | codeBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.use usual | official | temp | secondary | old (If known) DefinitionThe purpose of this identifier. Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers. Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary. Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known . IdentifierUse (required)Constraints
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConceptBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.type Description of identifier DefinitionA coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose. Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known. This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type. A coded type for an identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose. Identifier Type Codes (extensible)Constraints
|
system | S Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.system The namespace for the identifier value DefinitionEstablishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique. There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers. Identifier.system is always case sensitive.
General http://www.acme.com/identifiers/patient Mappings
|
value | S Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.value The value that is unique DefinitionThe portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system. If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
General 123456 Mappings
|
period | Σ I | 0..1 | Period | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.period Time period when id is/was valid for use DefinitionTime period during which identifier is/was valid for use. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). Period is not used for a duration (a measure of elapsed time). See Duration.
|
assigner | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Organization) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.identifier.assigner Organization that issued id (may be just text) DefinitionOrganization that issued/manages the identifier. The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
|
instantiatesCanonical | Σ | 0..1 | canonical(PlanDefinition | ActivityDefinition | Measure | OperationDefinition | Questionnaire) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.instantiatesCanonical Instantiates FHIR protocol or definition DefinitionThe URL pointing to a FHIR-defined protocol, guideline, orderset or other definition that is adhered to in whole or in part by this Communication. canonical(PlanDefinition | ActivityDefinition | Measure | OperationDefinition | Questionnaire) Constraints
|
instantiatesUri | Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.instantiatesUri Instantiates external protocol or definition DefinitionThe URL pointing to an externally maintained protocol, guideline, orderset or other definition that is adhered to in whole or in part by this Communication. This might be an HTML page, PDF, etc. or could just be a non-resolvable URI identifier.
|
basedOn | S Σ I | 0..* | Reference(ServiceRequest) | Element IdCommunication.basedOn Request fulfilled by this communication Alternate namesfulfills DefinitionAn order, proposal or plan fulfilled in whole or in part by this Communication. This must point to some sort of a 'Request' resource, such as CarePlan, CommunicationRequest, ServiceRequest, MedicationRequest, etc. Allowed aggregation: referenced Constraints
|
reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model). ResourceType (extensible)Constraints
|
identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.basedOn.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
partOf | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Resource) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.partOf Part of this action Alternate namescontainer DefinitionPart of this action. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
inResponseTo | S I | 0..* | Reference(Communication) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.inResponseTo Reply to DefinitionPrior communication that this communication is in response to. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository.
|
status | S Σ ?! | 1..1 | codeBindingFixed Value | Element IdCommunication.status preparation | in-progress | not-done | on-hold | stopped | completed | entered-in-error | unknown DefinitionThe status of the transmission. This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains the codes aborted and entered-in-error that mark the communication as not currently valid. The status of the communication. EventStatus (required)Constraints
completed
|
statusReason | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.statusReason Reason for current status Alternate namesSuspended Reason, Cancelled Reason DefinitionCaptures the reason for the current state of the Communication. This is generally only used for "exception" statuses such as "not-done", "suspended" or "aborted". The reason for performing the event at all is captured in reasonCode, not here. Codes for the reason why a communication did not happen. CommunicationNotDoneReason (example)Constraints
|
category | S | 0..* | CodeableConceptBinding | Element IdCommunication.category Message category DefinitionThe type of message conveyed such as alert, notification, reminder, instruction, etc. There may be multiple axes of categorization and one communication may serve multiple purposes. Codes for general categories of communications such as alerts, instructions, etc. CommunicationCategory (extensible)Constraints
|
coding | S Σ | 0..* | CodingBinding | Element IdCommunication.category.coding Code defined by a terminology system DefinitionA reference to a code defined by a terminology system. Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems. Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true. CommunicationCategory (extensible) Constraints
|
system | S Σ | 1..1 | uriFixed Value | Element IdCommunication.category.coding.system Identity of the terminology system DefinitionThe identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
https://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/CodeSystem/communication-category
|
version | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.version Version of the system - if relevant DefinitionThe version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
|
code | S Σ | 1..1 | code | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.code Symbol in syntax defined by the system DefinitionA symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). Need to refer to a particular code in the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
display | S Σ | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.display Representation defined by the system DefinitionA representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
userSelected | Σ | 0..1 | boolean | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.coding.userSelected If this coding was chosen directly by the user DefinitionIndicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
|
text | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.category.text Plain text representation of the concept DefinitionA human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
|
priority | Σ | 0..1 | codeBinding | Element IdCommunication.priority routine | urgent | asap | stat DefinitionCharacterizes how quickly the planned or in progress communication must be addressed. Includes concepts such as stat, urgent, routine. Used to prioritize workflow (such as which communication to read first) when the communication is planned or in progress. If missing, this communication should be treated with normal priority Codes indicating the relative importance of a communication. RequestPriority (required)Constraints
|
medium | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.medium A channel of communication DefinitionA channel that was used for this communication (e.g. email, fax). Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination. Codes for communication mediums such as phone, fax, email, in person, etc. v3.ParticipationMode (example)Constraints
| |
subject | S Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Patient) | Element IdCommunication.subject Focus of message Alternate namespatient DefinitionThe patient or group that was the focus of this communication. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Allowed aggregation: referenced Constraints
|
reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model). ResourceType (extensible)Constraints
|
identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.subject.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
topic | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic Description of the purpose/content DefinitionDescription of the purpose/content, similar to a subject line in an email. Communication.topic.text can be used without any codings. Codes describing the purpose or content of the communication. CommunicationTopic (example)Constraints
| |
coding | Σ | 0..* | Coding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding Code defined by a terminology system DefinitionA reference to a code defined by a terminology system. Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems. Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
|
system | Σ | 0..1 | uri | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.system Identity of the terminology system DefinitionThe identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
|
version | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.version Version of the system - if relevant DefinitionThe version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
|
code | Σ | 0..0 | code | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.code Symbol in syntax defined by the system DefinitionA symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). Need to refer to a particular code in the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.display Representation defined by the system DefinitionA representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. Note that FHIR strings SHALL NOT exceed 1MB in size
|
userSelected | Σ | 0..0 | boolean | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.coding.userSelected If this coding was chosen directly by the user DefinitionIndicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
|
text | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.topic.text Plain text representation of the concept DefinitionA human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
|
about | I | 0..1 | Reference(Resource) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.about Resources that pertain to this communication DefinitionOther resources that pertain to this communication and to which this communication should be associated. Don't use Communication.about element when a more specific element exists, such as basedOn or reasonReference.
|
encounter | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Encounter) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.encounter Encounter created as part of DefinitionThe Encounter during which this Communication was created or to which the creation of this record is tightly associated. This will typically be the encounter the event occurred within, but some activities may be initiated prior to or after the official completion of an encounter but still be tied to the context of the encounter.
|
sent | S | 0..1 | dateTime | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sent When sent DefinitionThe time when this communication was sent.
|
received | 0..1 | dateTime | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.received When received DefinitionThe time when this communication arrived at the destination.
| |
recipient | I | 0..* | Reference(Organization | Patient | Practitioner | PractitionerRole | HealthcareService) | Element IdCommunication.recipient Message recipient DefinitionThe entity (e.g. person, organization, clinical information system, care team or device) which was the target of the communication. If receipts need to be tracked by an individual, a separate resource instance will need to be created for each recipient. Multiple recipient communications are intended where either receipts are not tracked (e.g. a mass mail-out) or a receipt is captured in aggregate (all emails confirmed received by a particular time). References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Reference(Organization | Patient | Practitioner | PractitionerRole | HealthcareService) Constraints
|
sender | S I | 0..1 | Reference(PractitionerRole) | Element IdCommunication.sender Message sender DefinitionThe entity (e.g. person, organization, clinical information system, or device) which was the source of the communication. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Allowed aggregation: referenced Constraints
|
reference | S Σ I | 1..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.reference Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL DefinitionA reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
|
type | Σ | 0..1 | uriBinding | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.type Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") DefinitionThe expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent. The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources). This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified. Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model). ResourceType (extensible)Constraints
|
identifier | Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known DefinitionAn identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference. When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy. When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it. Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
|
display | Σ | 0..1 | string | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.sender.display Text alternative for the resource DefinitionPlain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
|
reasonCode | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.reasonCode Indication for message DefinitionThe reason or justification for the communication. Textual reasons can be captured using reasonCode.text. Codes for describing reasons for the occurrence of a communication. SNOMEDCTClinicalFindings (example)Constraints
|
reasonReference | Σ I | 0..1 | Reference(Condition | Observation | DiagnosticReport | DocumentReference) | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.reasonReference Why was communication done? DefinitionIndicates another resource whose existence justifies this communication. References SHALL be a reference to an actual FHIR resource, and SHALL be resolveable (allowing for access control, temporary unavailability, etc.). Resolution can be either by retrieval from the URL, or, where applicable by resource type, by treating an absolute reference as a canonical URL and looking it up in a local registry/repository. Reference(Condition | Observation | DiagnosticReport | DocumentReference) Constraints
|
payload | S | 0..* | BackboneElement | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.payload Message payload DefinitionText, attachment(s), or resource(s) that was communicated to the recipient.
|
content[x] | 1..1 | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.payload.content[x] Message part content DefinitionA communicated content (or for multi-part communications, one portion of the communication).
| ||
contentString | string | Data Type | ||
contentAttachment | Attachment | Data Type | ||
note | 0..* | Annotation | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note Comments made about the communication DefinitionAdditional notes or commentary about the communication by the sender, receiver or other interested parties. For systems that do not have structured annotations, they can simply communicate a single annotation with no author or time. This element may need to be included in narrative because of the potential for modifying information. Annotations SHOULD NOT be used to communicate "modifying" information that could be computable. (This is a SHOULD because enforcing user behavior is nearly impossible).
| |
author[x] | Σ | 0..1 | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note.author[x] Individual responsible for the annotation DefinitionThe individual responsible for making the annotation. Organization is used when there's no need for specific attribution as to who made the comment.
| |
authorString | string | Data Type | ||
time | Σ | 0..1 | dateTime | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note.time When the annotation was made DefinitionIndicates when this particular annotation was made.
|
text | Σ | 1..1 | markdown | There are no (further) constraints on this element Element IdCommunication.note.text The annotation - text content (as markdown) DefinitionThe text of the annotation in markdown format. Systems are not required to have markdown support, so the text should be readable without markdown processing. The markdown syntax is GFM - see https://github.github.com/gfm/
|
Table View
Communication | .. | |
Communication.meta | 1.. | |
Communication.meta.profile | 1.. | |
Communication.identifier | .. | |
Communication.identifier.system | .. | |
Communication.identifier.value | .. | |
Communication.instantiatesCanonical | ..1 | |
Communication.instantiatesUri | ..1 | |
Communication.basedOn | Reference(ServiceRequest) | .. |
Communication.basedOn.reference | 1.. | |
Communication.partOf | ..1 | |
Communication.inResponseTo | .. | |
Communication.status | .. | |
Communication.category | .. | |
Communication.category.coding | .. | |
Communication.category.coding.system | 1.. | |
Communication.category.coding.code | 1.. | |
Communication.category.coding.display | 1.. | |
Communication.priority | .. | |
Communication.medium | ..1 | |
Communication.subject | Reference(Patient) | .. |
Communication.subject.reference | 1.. | |
Communication.topic | .. | |
Communication.topic.coding | .. | |
Communication.topic.coding.code | ..0 | |
Communication.topic.coding.userSelected | ..0 | |
Communication.about | ..1 | |
Communication.sent | .. | |
Communication.recipient | Reference(Organization | Patient | Practitioner | PractitionerRole | HealthcareService) | .. |
Communication.sender | Reference(PractitionerRole) | .. |
Communication.sender.reference | 1.. | |
Communication.reasonCode | ..1 | |
Communication.reasonReference | ..1 | |
Communication.payload | .. | |
Communication.payload.content[x] | string, Attachment | .. |
Communication.note | .. | |
Communication.note.author[x] | string | .. |
JSON View
{ "resourceType": "StructureDefinition", "id": "ca-on-eReferral-profile-Communication", "url": "http://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/StructureDefinition/ca-on-eReferral-profile-Communication", "version": "1.0.0", "name": "EReferralCommunication", "title": "Communication", "status": "draft", "description": "Communication resource is used to achieve the bi-directional communication between two systems. The Communication resource can be used to ask questions regarding a referral, request a referral be updated with missing information, or request additional information not covered by the specific referral dataset.", "fhirVersion": "4.0.1", "kind": "resource", "abstract": false, "type": "Communication", "baseDefinition": "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Communication", "derivation": "constraint", "differential": { "element": [ { "id": "Communication.meta", "path": "Communication.meta", "min": 1, "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.meta.profile", "path": "Communication.meta.profile", "comment": "#### **_` FOR eREFERRAL USAGE: The meta.profile = http://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/StructureDefinition/ca-on-eReferral-profile-Communication|1.0.0 `_**\n\nIt is up to the server and/or other infrastructure of policy to determine whether/how these claims are verified and/or updated over time. The list of profile URLs is a set.", "min": 1, "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.identifier", "path": "Communication.identifier", "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.identifier.system", "path": "Communication.identifier.system", "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.identifier.value", "path": "Communication.identifier.value", "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.instantiatesCanonical", "path": "Communication.instantiatesCanonical", "max": "1" }, { "id": "Communication.instantiatesUri", "path": "Communication.instantiatesUri", "max": "1" }, { "id": "Communication.basedOn", "path": "Communication.basedOn", "type": [ { "code": "Reference", "targetProfile": [ "http://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/StructureDefinition/ca-on-eReferral-profile-ServiceRequest" ], "aggregation": [ "referenced" ] } ], "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.basedOn.reference", "path": "Communication.basedOn.reference", "min": 1, "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.partOf", "path": "Communication.partOf", "max": "1" }, { "id": "Communication.inResponseTo", "path": "Communication.inResponseTo", "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.status", "path": "Communication.status", "fixedCode": "completed", "mustSupport": true, "binding": { "strength": "required", "valueSet": "http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/event-status" } }, { "id": "Communication.category", "path": "Communication.category", "mustSupport": true, "binding": { "strength": "extensible", "valueSet": "http://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/ValueSet/communication-category" } }, { "id": "Communication.category.coding", "path": "Communication.category.coding", "mustSupport": true, "binding": { "strength": "extensible", "valueSet": "http://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/ValueSet/communication-category" } }, { "id": "Communication.category.coding.system", "path": "Communication.category.coding.system", "min": 1, "fixedUri": "https://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/CodeSystem/communication-category", "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.category.coding.code", "path": "Communication.category.coding.code", "min": 1, "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.category.coding.display", "path": "Communication.category.coding.display", "min": 1, "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.priority", "path": "Communication.priority", "binding": { "strength": "required", "valueSet": "http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/request-priority" } }, { "id": "Communication.medium", "path": "Communication.medium", "max": "1" }, { "id": "Communication.subject", "path": "Communication.subject", "type": [ { "code": "Reference", "targetProfile": [ "http://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/StructureDefinition/ca-on-eReferral-profile-Patient" ], "aggregation": [ "referenced" ] } ], "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.subject.reference", "path": "Communication.subject.reference", "min": 1, "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.topic.coding.code", "path": "Communication.topic.coding.code", "max": "0" }, { "id": "Communication.topic.coding.userSelected", "path": "Communication.topic.coding.userSelected", "max": "0" }, { "id": "Communication.about", "path": "Communication.about", "max": "1" }, { "id": "Communication.sent", "path": "Communication.sent", "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.recipient", "path": "Communication.recipient", "type": [ { "code": "Reference", "targetProfile": [ "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Organization", "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient", "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Practitioner", "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/PractitionerRole", "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/HealthcareService" ] } ] }, { "id": "Communication.sender", "path": "Communication.sender", "type": [ { "code": "Reference", "targetProfile": [ "http://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/StructureDefinition/ca-on-eReferral-profile-PractitionerRole" ], "aggregation": [ "referenced" ] } ], "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.sender.reference", "path": "Communication.sender.reference", "min": 1, "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.reasonCode", "path": "Communication.reasonCode", "max": "1" }, { "id": "Communication.reasonReference", "path": "Communication.reasonReference", "max": "1" }, { "id": "Communication.payload", "path": "Communication.payload", "mustSupport": true }, { "id": "Communication.payload.content[x]", "path": "Communication.payload.content[x]", "type": [ { "code": "string" }, { "code": "Attachment" } ] }, { "id": "Communication.note.author[x]", "path": "Communication.note.author[x]", "type": [ { "code": "string" } ] } ] } }
Usage
The Communication Resource is used in this IG to provide bidirectional communication between two systems and their users. The Communication resource can be used to ask questions about a referral, to request information or to provide information.
Although the Communication resource has the ability to carry attachments as .payload.content
, it SHALL NOT be used to attach .supportingInfo
to a ServiceRequest. (Use the Document Reference resource for this purpose.)
Notes
.id
- used to uniquely identify the resource
- if a persistent identity for the resource is not available to use when constructing a message Bundle for transmission via Direct Messaging, a UUID SHOULD be used in this element (with a corresponding value in
Bundle.entry.fullUrl
)
.meta.profile
- used to declare conformance to this profile
- populate with a fixed value: `http://ehealthontario.ca/fhir/StructureDefinition/ca-on-eReferral-profile-Communication|1.0.0'
.basedOn
- used to associate the Communication with the ServiceRequest
- SHALL be populated with a reference to the ServiceRequest being performed
- if the Communication is being transmitted via messaging, the referenced ServiceRequest resource SHALL be included in the message as a
Bundle.entry
- NOTE: this element will reference multiple ServiceRequests in situations where the Communication relates to a requisition vs a single request, see business rules for more information
.inResponseTo
- indicates that the Communication is a response to another Communication and creates an association with the prior
- populate with
Communication.id
from the Communication being responded to - where a Communication is part of a converstation, implementers SHOULD include both the Communication in
MessageHeader.focus
and the one it is.inResponseTo
as Bundle entries to allow them to be correctly associated with one another on the receiving system (others further up the chain MAY be omitted on the assumption that any necessary associations between Communications have already been made)
.status
- SHOULD be populated with the value "completed" when it is submitted via Direct Messaging
.category
- used to indicate the category of Communication
- use of values
- "gen" when sending general communications
- "plan" when sending plan of care on service completion
- "rfi" when sending via Direct Messaging "add-rfi" event
.priority
- MAY be used to indicate the priority of the Communication
- typically populated with "routine"
.subject
- used to associate a Communication with the patient is about
- SHOULD NOT be populated for general Communications that are about the ServiceRequest, not the patient
- if populated, it SHALL reference the Patient in
ServiceRequest.subject
(e.g.: where theCommunication.category
is "plan")
.topic.text
- MAY be used to describe the purpose or content of the Communication (coding is not supported)
.sent
- populate with the time when the Communication was sent
.received
- MAY be populated by the receiver with the time the Communication was received
- SHALL NOT be populated in the Communication in
MessageHeader.focus
on the "add-communication" event
.recipient
- typically not used (conceptually the ServiceRequest is the recipient)
.sender
- used to identify the person who sent the messaging (e.g.: when rendering a conversation between individuals for display in the receiving system)
- SHALL be populated with a reference to the PractionerRole of the person sending the communication
- if the Communication is being transmitted via messaging, the referenced PractionerRole resource SHALL be included in the message as a
Bundle.entry
.payload.content
the content of the Communication
business rules:
- there SHALL NOT be more than one instance of
.payload.contentString
per Communication instance - there MAY be multiple instances of
.payload.contentAttachment
per Communication instance
- there SHALL NOT be more than one instance of
expected use:
- when sendng JUST a text message, send a single
.payload.contentString
- when sendng JUST an attachment, send a single
.payload.contentAttachment
- when sending a text message with attachments, send multiple instances of
.payload
- one with the message (
.payload.contentString
) - one for each attachment (
.payload.contentAttachment
)
- one with the message (
For eConsult:
- use the above business rules and expected use for sending communication between referrers and receipients
- for adding notes use
payload.contentAttachment
- when sendng JUST a text message, send a single
NOTE: although sending base64 encoded .payload.contentAttachment.data
is supported, implementers of Direct Messaging SHOULD make binary attachments be made available to retrieve from a server using a .payload.contentAttachment.url
to reduce message sizes