For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
This section tracks changes made across releases of this Implementation Guide (IG).
| VERSION NO. | DATE | SUMMARY OF CHANGE | Changed By |
|---|---|---|---|
| v 1.0.0-Draft1 | 2026-02-03 | Initial draft | OH DHS Team |
| v 1.0.0-Draft2 | 2026-06-11 | Addressed open review, OH Privacy, and CA Core+ / ON‑EHR harmonization comments | OH DHS Team |
| v 1.0.0-Final | 2026-06-24 | DHISC Approval received | OH DHS Team |
| Item No. | IG Page | IG Section | IG Subsection | Summary of change | Change description | Source of Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | All | All | All | Fixed typos, formatting and style | DETAILS: Corrected typos, formatting, and editorial inconsistencies. RATIONALE: To improve clarity, readability, and overall consistency of the document. | Open review comment |
| 2 | All | All | All | Indigenous governance language updates | DETAILS: Replaced “stakeholder(s)” with “partners” across the IG. RATIONALE: To follow enterprise guidance and use appropriate language. | Open review comment |
| 3 | Business Context | Business Model | 2.1.1. Context | Removed Patient access from use cases | DETAILS: Updated the IG to remove Patient access. RATIONALE: Addresses OH Privacy comments and clarifies provider-only query scope. | OH Privacy comment |
| 4 | Business Context | Business Data | 2.2.2. Medical Imaging Subject Area | Added clarification that ImagingStudy is not part of the MI FHIR submission and will be supported by the MI DICOM IG | DETAILS: Added context on how the ImagingStudy resource is generated. RATIONALE: Addresses confusion about ImagingStudy scope in the IG. | Open review comment |
| 5 | Business Context | Use Cases | 2.3.1. Actors | Aligned PCR description with OH Digital Playbook terminology for consistency and clarity | DETAILS: Aligned PCR description with OH Digital Playbook terminology. RATIONALE: Ensures consistency and clarity within OH. | Open review comment |
| 6 | Business Context | Use Cases | Data Consumption Use Cases - Provincial Clinical Viewer Queries | Clarified that the initial query use cases are in scope for Provincial Clinical Viewer only | DETAILS: Removed duplicate query use case, clarified scope for consuming systems, and included alternate consent block scenarios. RATIONALE: Aligns with Provincial Clinical Viewer context; third-party integrations are out of scope and deferred to future phases. | Open review comment; OH Privacy comment |
| 7 | FHIR Artifacts | Interactions | 4.1.1. Section Contents | Removed the “Submit MI Bundle” interaction to clarify the scope of the asynchronous MI data submission flow | DETAILS: Removed Submit MI Bundle interaction and added asynchronous-related details in the other submission pages. RATIONALE: Batch submission for miCDR contribution is out of scope. | Open review comment |
| 8 | FHIR Artifacts | Interactions | Submit Interactions > 4.1.2.1.2. Transaction Response | Clarified asynchronous submission behavior | DETAILS: Submissions return HTTP 202 and are queued for validation; valid data is stored in miCDR, and errors are captured in DQS (out of scope). RATIONALE: Provides high-level clarity on processing flow and error handling scope. | Open review comment |
| 9 | FHIR Artifacts | Interactions | All Search Interactions | Clarification on the patient identifier in search parameters | DETAILS: Updated usage notes for mandatory patient search identifiers. RATIONALE: Clarifies that only one identifier needs to be sent (MRN is preferred). | Open review comment |
| 10 | FHIR Artifacts | Interactions | Interaction: Search MI ImagingStudy | Removed duplicate procedure code parameter | DETAILS: Removed “procedure code” as an optional search parameter for basedOn:ServiceRequest.category in ImagingStudy search. RATIONALE: Avoids duplication, as procedure code is already captured in basedOn:ServiceRequest.code. |
Open review comment |
| 11 | FHIR Artifacts | Profiles | Profile: DiagnosticReport (Submission) | Added guidance for DiagnosticReport submission | DETAILS: Added guidance for populating DiagnosticReport narrative fields (result, presentedForm, conclusion), including expected use and required vs optional elements. RATIONALE: Ensures consistent and conformant reporting. |
Open review comment |
| 12 | FHIR Artifacts | Profiles | Profile: ImagingStudy | Updated ImagingStudy accession identifier cardinality to 1..1 | DETAILS: Updated cardinality of ImagingStudy.identifier:accession.type to 1..1 (required). RATIONALE: Ensures identifier type is always defined and clear to consumers. |
Open review comment |
| 13 | FHIR Artifacts | Profiles | Profile: Patient (Submission) | Provided additional guidance on the scope of jurisdictional health card numbers in the data submission | DETAILS: Updated usage notes and clarified that Ontario health card number must be sent if available; unsupported identifiers are not permitted. RATIONALE: Provides clear submission expectations. | Open review comment |
| 14 | FHIR Artifacts | Profiles | Profile: DiagnosticReport (Submission) | Updated conformance notes for accession identifier system | DETAILS: Updated conformance notes for identifier:accession.system. RATIONALE: Clarifies OH expectations for accession (OID) and placer order (URI) systems. |
Open review comment |
| 15 | FHIR Artifacts | Profiles | Profile: Patient (Submission) | Aligned Patient.identifier:MRN.type and Patient.identifier:JHN.type with ON‑EHR identifiers |
DETAILS: Aligned Patient.identifier:MRN.type and Patient.identifier:JHN.type with ON‑EHR identifiers. RATIONALE: Ensures consistency with ON‑EHR identifier definitions. |
CA Core+ and ON-EHR Harmonization |
| 16 | FHIR Artifacts | Profiles | Profile: Encounter (Submission) | Removed duplicate guidance on .type |
DETAILS: Removed duplicate guidance on .type. RATIONALE: Eliminates redundancy and improves clarity within the IG. |
OH Privacy comment |
| 17 | FHIR Artifacts | Profiles | Profile: Endpoint | Added usage note for .address clarifying base service URL format with QIDO and WADO examples |
DETAILS: Added examples to Endpoint.address to show that it SHALL contain the base service URL (e.g., QIDO or WADO). RATIONALE: Defines a consistent format so submitters and consumers use and interpret endpoint values the same way. |
Open review comment |
This section lists updates to ValueSets and CodeSystems used in this IG.
| VALUE SET/CODE SYSTEM | VERSION No. | Date | SUMMARY OF CHANGE |
|---|---|---|---|
| DocumentReferenceTypeEHR | v1.0.0 | June 15, 2026 | Updated value set binding for DocumentReference.type to DocumentReferenceTypeEHR. |
| DiagnosticReportCodeEHR | v1.1.0 | June 15, 2026 | Updated value set binding for DiagnosticReport.code to DiagnosticReportCodeEHR. |
| LocalImagingProcedureCodeEHR | v2.0.0 | June 15, 2026 | Updated value set binding for DiagnosticReport.code to LocalImagingProcedureCodeEHR. |
| HealthCareProviderRoleCode | v1.0.0 | June 15, 2026 | Updated value set binding for PractitionerRole.code to HealthCareProviderRoleCode. |
| HealthCareProviderRoleType | v1.0.0 | June 15, 2026 | Updated value set binding for PractitionerRole.code to HealthCareProviderRoleType. |