SL_FHIR

The purpose of this identifier.

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known .

A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.

This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.

A coded type for an identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

The portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system.

If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/rendered-value). Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.

Time period during which identifier is/was valid for use.

Organization that issued/manages the identifier.

The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.

The current state of the encounter (not the state of the patient within the encounter - that is subjectState).

Note that internal business rules will determine the appropriate transitions that may occur between statuses (and also classes).

Current state of the encounter.

Concepts representing classification of patient encounter such as ambulatory (outpatient), inpatient, emergency, home health or others due to local variations.

Classification of the encounter.

Indicates the urgency of the encounter.

Indicates the urgency of the encounter.

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

Broad categorization of the service that is to be provided (e.g. cardiology).

Broad categorization of the service that is to be provided.

The patient or group related to this encounter. In some use-cases the patient MAY not be present, such as a case meeting about a patient between several practitioners or a careteam.

While the encounter is always about the patient, the patient might not actually be known in all contexts of use, and there may be a group of patients that could be anonymous (such as in a group therapy for Alcoholics Anonymous - where the recording of the encounter could be used for billing on the number of people/staff and not important to the context of the specific patients) or alternately in veterinary care a herd of sheep receiving treatment (where the animals are not individually tracked).

The subjectStatus value can be used to track the patient's status within the encounter. It details whether the patient has arrived or departed, has been triaged or is currently in a waiting status.

Different use-cases are likely to have different permitted transitions between states, such as an Emergency department could use arrived when the patient first presents, then triaged once has been assessed by a nurse, then receiving-care once treatment begins, however other sectors may use a different set of these values, or their own custom set in place of this example valueset provided.

Current status of the subject within the encounter.

Where a specific encounter should be classified as a part of a specific episode(s) of care this field should be used. This association can facilitate grouping of related encounters together for a specific purpose, such as government reporting, issue tracking, association via a common problem. The association is recorded on the encounter as these are typically created after the episode of care and grouped on entry rather than editing the episode of care to append another encounter to it (the episode of care could span years).

The request this encounter satisfies (e.g. incoming referral or procedure request).

The group(s) of individuals, organizations that are allocated to participate in this encounter. The participants backbone will record the actuals of when these individuals participated during the encounter.

Another Encounter of which this encounter is a part of (administratively or in time).

This is also used for associating a child's encounter back to the mother's encounter.

Refer to the Notes section in the Patient resource for further details.

The organization that is primarily responsible for this Encounter's services. This MAY be the same as the organization on the Patient record, however it could be different, such as if the actor performing the services was from an external organization (which may be billed seperately) for an external consultation. Refer to the colonoscopy example on the Encounter examples tab.

Role of participant in encounter.

The participant type indicates how an individual actor participates in an encounter. It includes non-practitioner participants, and for practitioners this is to describe the action type in the context of this encounter (e.g. Admitting Dr, Attending Dr, Translator, Consulting Dr). This is different to the practitioner roles which are functional roles, derived from terms of employment, education, licensing, etc.

Role of participant in encounter.

The period of time that the specified participant participated in the encounter. These can overlap or be sub-sets of the overall encounter's period.

Person involved in the encounter, the patient/group is also included here to indicate that the patient was actually participating in the encounter. Not including the patient here covers use cases such as a case meeting between practitioners about a patient - non contact times.

For planning purposes, Appointments may include a CareTeam participant to indicate that one specific person from the CareTeam will be assigned, but that assignment might not happen until the Encounter begins. Hence CareTeam is not included in Encounter.participant, as the specific individual should be assigned and represented as a Practitioner or other person resource.

Similarly, Location can be included in Appointment.participant to assist with planning. However, the patient location is tracked on the Encounter in the Encounter.location property to allow for additional metadata and history to be recorded.

The role of the participant can be used to declare what the actor will be doing in the scope of this encounter participation.

If the individual is not specified during planning, then it is expected that the individual will be filled in at a later stage prior to the encounter commencing.

The appointment that scheduled this encounter.

Connection details of a virtual service (e.g. conference call).

There are two types of virtual meetings that often exist:

• a persistent, virtual meeting room that can only be used for a single purpose at a time,
• and a dynamic virtual meeting room that is generated on demand for a specific purpose.

Implementers may consider using Location.virtualService for persistent meeting rooms.

If each participant would have a different meeting link, an extension using the VirtualServiceContactDetail can be applied to the Encounter.participant BackboneElement.

The actual start and end time of the encounter.

If not (yet) known, the end of the Period may be omitted.

The planned end date/time (or discharge date) of the encounter.

Actual quantity of time the encounter lasted. This excludes the time during leaves of absence.

When missing it is the time in between the start and end values.

If the precision on these values is low (e.g. to the day only) then this may be considered was an all day (or multi-day) encounter, unless the duration is included, where that amount of time occurred sometime during the interval.

May differ from the time in Encounter.period due to leave of absence(s).

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

Reason the encounter takes place, expressed as a code or a reference to another resource. For admissions, this can be used for a coded admission diagnosis.

Reason why the encounter takes place.

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

A reference to a resource the provides exact details about the information being referenced.

Role that this diagnosis has within the encounter (e.g. admission, billing, discharge …).

The type of diagnosis this condition represents.

The set of accounts that may be used for billing for this Encounter.

The billing system may choose to allocate billable items associated with the Encounter to different referenced Accounts based on internal business rules.

Diet preferences reported by the patient.

Used to track patient's diet restrictions and/or preference. For a complete description of the nutrition needs of a patient during their stay, one should use the nutritionOrder resource which links to Encounter.

For example, a patient may request both a dairy-free and nut-free diet preference (not mutually exclusive).

Medical, cultural or ethical food preferences to help with catering requirements.

Any special requests that have been made for this encounter, such as the provision of specific equipment or other things.

Special arrangements.

Special courtesies that may be provided to the patient during the encounter (VIP, board member, professional courtesy).

Although the specialCourtesy property can contain values like VIP, the purpose of this field is intended to be used for flagging additional benefits that might occur for the patient during the encounter.

It could include things like the patient is to have a private room, special room features, receive a friendly visit from hospital adminisitration, or should be briefed on treatment by senior staff during the stay.

It is not specifically intended to be used for securing the specific record - that is the purpose of the security meta tag, and where appropriate, both fields could be used.

Special courtesies.

Pre-admission identifier.

The location/organization from which the patient came before admission.

From where patient was admitted (physician referral, transfer).

From where the patient was admitted.

Indicates that this encounter is directly related to a prior admission, often because the conditions addressed in the prior admission were not fully addressed.

The reason for re-admission of this admission encounter.

Location/organization to which the patient is discharged.

Category or kind of location after discharge.

Discharge Disposition.

The location where the encounter takes place.

The status of the participants' presence at the specified location during the period specified. If the participant is no longer at the location, then the period will have an end date/time.

When the patient is no longer active at a location, then the period end date is entered, and the status may be changed to completed.

The status of the location.

This will be used to specify the required levels (bed/ward/room/etc.) desired to be recorded to simplify either messaging or query.

This information is de-normalized from the Location resource to support the easier understanding of the encounter resource and processing in messaging or query.

There may be many levels in the hierachy, and this may only pic specific levels that are required for a specific usage scenario.

Physical form of the location.

Time period during which the patient was present at the location.