Profilo implementato per indicizzare un documento e renderlo disponibile ad un sistema sanitario.
Per la corretta validazione della risorsa, secondo il profilo descritto in questa pagina, impostare nell'elemento meta profile il riferimento alla StructureDefinition:
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference
Short description
A reference to a document
Definition
A reference to a document of any kind for any purpose. Provides metadata about the document so that the document can be discovered and managed. The scope of a document is any seralized object with a mime-type, so includes formal patient centric documents (CDA), cliical notes, scanned paper, and non-patient specific documents like policy text.
Comments
Usually, this is used for documents other than those defined by FHIR.
dom-2: If the resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT contain nested Resources contained.contained.empty()
dom-3: If the resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL be referred to from elsewhere in the resource or SHALL refer to the containing resource contained.where((('#'+id in (%resource.descendants().reference | %resource.descendants().as(canonical) | %resource.descendants().as(uri) | %resource.descendants().as(url))) or descendants().where(reference = '#').exists() or descendants().where(as(canonical) = '#').exists() or descendants().where(as(canonical) = '#').exists()).not()).trace('unmatched', id).empty()
dom-4: If a resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT have a meta.versionId or a meta.lastUpdated contained.meta.versionId.empty() and contained.meta.lastUpdated.empty()
dom-5: If a resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT have a security label contained.meta.security.empty()
dom-6: A resource should have narrative for robust management text.`div`.exists()
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.meta
Short description
Metadata about the resource
Definition
The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.implicitRules
Short description
A set of rules under which this content was created
Definition
A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.
Comments
Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.language
Short description
Language of the resource content
Definition
The base language in which the resource is written.
Comments
Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.text
Short description
Text summary of the resource, for human interpretation
Alternate names
narrative, html, xhtml, display
Definition
A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.
Comments
Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.
These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.
Comments
This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Identificativo univoco del documento sul sistema sorgente, corrisponde all'identificativo del documento assegnato e generato dal verticale da cui proviene il documento.
Questo identificativo univoco può essere utilizzato per identificare il documento in qualsiasi sistema.
Requirements
The structure and format of this Id shall be consistent with the specification corresponding to the formatCode attribute. (e.g. for a DICOM standard document a 64-character numeric UID, for an HL7 CDA format a serialization of the CDA Document Id extension and root in the form "oid^extension", where OID is a 64 digits max, and the Id is a 16 UTF-8 char max. If the OID is coded without the extension then the '^' character shall not be included.).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.type
Short description
Description of identifier
Definition
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
Valore univoco dell'identificativo associato al documento dal sistema sorgente
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.assigner
Short description
Organization that issued id (may be just text)
Definition
Organization that issued/manages the identifier.
Comments
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
Identificativo del documento che crea il CDR in fase di ingestion, non presente in input dai verticali
Comments
L'attributo entryUUID è un identificatore univoco globale destinato principalmente alla gestione interna dei documenti Scopi. Al contrario, l'attributo uniqueId viene utilizzato per i riferimenti esterni (ad esempio, collegamenti, ecc.).
Esempio XDS:
Il valore di entryUUID è codificato nell'attributo id XML su ExtrinsicObject che rappresenta il DocumentEntry. Nell'esempio seguente, la voceUUID è urn:uuid:a6e06ca8-0c75-4064-9e5c-88b9045a96f6
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.identifier.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.identifier.type
Short description
Description of identifier
Definition
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
L'identificativo dovrà essere composta dalla concatenazione di (DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.value + DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.system)
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.identifier.assigner
Short description
Organization that issued id (may be just text)
Definition
Organization that issued/manages the identifier.
Comments
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())
Mappings
workflow: Event.status
w5: FiveWs.status
v2: TXA-19
rim: interim: .completionCode="IN" & ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="active"; final: .completionCode="AU" && ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="complete" and not(./inboundRelationship[typeCode="SUBJ" and isNormalActRelationship()]/source[subsumesCode("ActClass#CACT") and moodCode="EVN" and domainMember("ReviseDocument", code) and isNormalAct()]); amended: .completionCode="AU" && ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="complete" and ./inboundRelationship[typeCode="SUBJ" and isNormalActRelationship()]/source[subsumesCode("ActClass#CACT") and moodCode="EVN" and domainMember("ReviseDocument", code) and isNormalAct() and statusCode="completed"]; withdrawn : .completionCode=NI && ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="obsolete"
Tipologia del documento.
Il codice che specifica il tipo preciso di documento dal punto di vista dell'utente (ad esempio, il codice LOINC).
Comments
Nell'esempio seguente è contenuto un valore di codice (10160-0) dello schema di codifica LOINC, identificato da un OID (2.16.840.1.113883.6.1).
Esempio XDS:
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())
Mappings
workflow: Event.code
w5: FiveWs.class
fhircomposition: Composition.type
v2: TXA-2
rim: ./code
xds: DocumentEntry.type
cda: ClinicalDocument/code/@code
The typeCode should be mapped from the ClinicalDocument/code element to a set of document type codes configured in the affinity domain. One suggested coding system to use for typeCode is LOINC, in which case the mapping step can be omitted.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Valorizzare con uno delle descrizioni presenti nella tabella Affinity Domain Tabella 2.19-1.
Value set per il metadato XDSDocumentEntry.typeCode
I valori ammissibili per questo metadato devono corrispondere ai codici LOINC riportati in Tabella
2.19-1
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.system
Short description
Identity of the terminology system
Definition
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.userSelected
Short description
If this coding was chosen directly by the user
Definition
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeAffinityDomain
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Lo schema di codifica deve essere valorizzato con l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.6.1.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeMedas
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeMedas.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeMedas.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
Valorizzare con uno delle descrizioni presenti nella tabella Affinity Domain Tabella 2.19-1. Value set per il metadato XDSDocumentEntry.typeCode
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
Categorizzazione del tipo di documento a cui si fa riferimento
Comments
Key metadata element describing the the category or classification of the document. This is a broader perspective that groups similar documents based on how they would be used. This is a primary key used in searching.
Codice che specifica la classificazione di utilizzo di alto livello del tipo di documento (ad esempio, Report, Riepilogo, Immagini, Piano di trattamento, Preferenze del paziente, Flusso di lavoro).
In riferimento alla Tabella 2.3-1. Value set per il metadato XDSDocumentEntry.classCode di Affinity Domain Italia
Esempio XDS :
cda: Derived from a mapping of /ClinicalDocument/code/@code to an Affinity Domain specified coded value to use and coding system. Affinity Domains are encouraged to use the appropriate value for Type of Service, based on the LOINC Type of Service (see Page 53 of the LOINC User's Manual). Must be consistent with /ClinicalDocument/code/@code
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Lo schema di codifica deve essere valorizzato con l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.3.3.6.1.5 come da Affinity Domain
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Metadato che rappresenta la classe a cui il documento appartiene.
I valori ammissibili per questo metadato sono elencati in Tabella 2.3-1 dell'affinity domain.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding.userSelected
Short description
If this coding was chosen directly by the user
Definition
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
A chi o a cosa si riferisce il documento. Il documento può riguardare una persona (paziente o operatore sanitario), un dispositivo (ad esempio una macchina) o anche un gruppo di soggetti (come un documento su una mandria di animali da allevamento o un insieme di pazienti che condividono un'esposizione comune).
Comments
In XDS corrisponde a DocumentEntry.patientId
Questo metadato permette di identificare il paziente a cui è correlato il documento prodotto, in
particolare il codice fiscale se è un cittadino italiano assistito dal SSN
Il metadato identifica l’autore del documento che deve essere indicizzato.
Nel caso di una transazione ITI-41 , viene solitamente fatto coincidere con una reference ad un PractitionerRole
In XDS.b l'attributo è composto dalle informazioni "authorInstitution" ed "authorPerson"
AuthorInstitution identifica la struttura a cui appartiene l’autore che ha creato il
documento.
AuthorPerson e identifica il codice fiscale della persona fisica che ha creato il documento in qualità di autore o, in sua assenza, la partita IVA della persona giuridica al quale si riferisce l’autore.
La persona o istituzione che ha validato/firmato legalmente il documento.
Comments
Rappresenta un partecipante all'interno di un'istituzione autrice che ha legalmente autenticato o attestato il documento. L'autenticazione legale implica che un documento sia stato firmato manualmente o elettronicamente dal legalAuthenticator.
Viene solitamente fatto coincidere con una reference ad un Practitioner
Esempio XDS.b:
<rim:Slot name="legalAuthenticator">
rim:ValueListrim:Value^Welby^Marcus^^^Dr^MD</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.custodian
Short description
Organization which maintains the document
Definition
Identifies the organization or group who is responsible for ongoing maintenance of and access to the document.
Comments
Identifies the logical organization (software system, vendor, or department) to go to find the current version, where to report issues, etc. This is different from the physical location (URL, disk drive, or server) of the document, which is the technical location of the document, which host may be delegated to the management of some other organization.
Esprime la relazione con un altro documento esistente.
Comments
In una operazione di aggiornamento di un documento, verrà inserito l'identificativo (master identifier) esistente del documento "padre" da cui questa risorsa deriva.
L’elemento Association deve essere utilizzato per associare un oggetto XDSDocumentEntry all’oggetto XDSSubmissionSet e per indicare relazioni tra documenti.
Esempio XDS.b in caso di REPLACE (sostituzione o aggiornamento di un documento esistente):
<Association associationType="urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:RPLC" id="ExampleRPLId_001" sourceObject="urn:uuid:08a15a6f-5b4a-42de-8f95-
89474f83ytuz" targetObject="urn:uuid:08a15a6f-5b4a-42de-8f95-89474f83abdf"/>
Un altro esempio di valorizzazione riguardante l’aggiornamento dei soli metadati e non del relativo
documento nel repository è mostrato di seguito:
<rim:Association associationType="urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep:AssociationType:HasMember" id="urn:uuid:f0306f51-975f-434e-a61c-c5943d3862" sourceObject="urn:uuid:a6e06ca8-0c75-4064-9e5c-88b9045a96f6" targetObject="Documento01">
<rim:Slot name="SubmissionSetStatus">
rim:ValueListrim:ValueOriginal</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
</rim:Association>
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
Alternate names
extensions, user content, modifiers
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The type of relationship that this document has with anther document.
Comments
Tipi di associazioni (associationType) per un corretto mapping XDS.b:
urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep AssociationType:HasMember : Appartenenza di un oggetto XDSDocumentEntry all’oggetto XDSSubmissionSet
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:RPLC : Sostituzione (Replace)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:XFRM : Trasformazione (Transformation)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:APND : Aggiunta (Addendum)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:XFRM_RPLC : Sostituzione con trasformazione (Replace with transformation)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:signs : Firma digitale (Digital Signature)
urn:ihe:iti:2010:AssociationType:IsSnapshotOf Istantanea di un insieme di metadati creati on-demand (Snapshot of on-demand document entry)
I riferimenti DEVONO essere un riferimento a una risorsa FHIR effettiva e DEVONO essere risolvibili (consentendo il controllo degli accessi, l'indisponibilità temporanea, ecc.). La risoluzione può avvenire tramite recupero dall'URL o, ove applicabile in base al tipo di risorsa, trattando un riferimento assoluto come un URL canonico e cercandolo in un registro/repository locale.
Nel caso di replace/update di un documento esistente, verrà quindi inserita la reference alla risorsa FHIR di tale documento già presente.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.reference
Short description
Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
Definition
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.
Comments
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.type
Short description
Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
Definition
The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.
The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).
Comments
This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.
Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
Definition
An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.
Comments
In questo caso sarà popolato con il DocumentReference.masterIdentifier della risorsa "padre" da sostituire.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
Da assegnare lo stesso valore di "DocumentReference.masterIdentifier" del documento da sostituire
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.display
Short description
Text alternative for the resource
Definition
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.
Comments
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
Una serie di codici Security-Tag che specificano il livello di privacy/sicurezza del documento.
Questo metadato viene utilizzato per indicare il livello di riservatezza dei dati contenuti nel
documento che deve essere indicizzato.
Se il documento che deve essere indicizzato è in formato HL7 CDA Release 2.0, allora il valore di
questo metadato corrisponde al valore dell’attributo /ClinicalDocument/confidentialityCode/@code.
Requirements
Use of the Health Care Privacy/Security Classification (HCS) system of security-tag use is recommended.
Comments
Lista di valori possibili definiti da Affinity domain Italia.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.coding.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Lo schema di codifica deve essere valorizzato con l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.5.25
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.coding.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
Contiene informazioni riguardanti il documento da sottomettere ed il suo formato.
Potrebbe contenere una lista di elementi e ripetizioni, ognuno con un formato differente.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
Alternate names
extensions, user content, modifiers
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Contenuto valorizzato con il repository Id assegnato da FSE
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Tale metadato identifica il MIME type del documento indicizzato e ha lo scopo di fornire indicazione
all’attore XDS Document Consumer sulla tipologia del documento.
Nel formato XDS.b viene mappato con DocumentEntry.mimeType.
Esempio XDS.b:
<rim:ExtrinsicObject mimeType="text/x-cda-r2+xml" id="Document01"
objectType="urn:uuid:7edca82f-054d-47f2-a032-9b2a5b5186c1">
Requirements
Processors of the data need to be able to know how to interpret the data.
Riferimento alla url della risorsa Binary contenuta nel Bundle.
Requirements
The data needs to be transmitted by reference.
Comments
In XDS.b DocumentEntry.repositoryUniqueId or DocumentEntry.URI
Esempi XDS.b:
DocumentEntry.repositoryUniqueId
L'identificativo globale univoco del repository nel quale il document referenziato da DocumentEntry può essere recuperato.
<rim:Slot name="repositoryUniqueId">
rim:ValueListrim:Value1.3.6.1.4.5</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
DocumentEntry.URI
URI al documento
<rim:Slot name="URI">
rim:ValueListrim:ValueDOC001.XML</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.attachment.hash
Short description
Hash of the data (sha-1, base64ed)
Definition
The calculated hash of the data using SHA-1. Represented using base64.
Requirements
Included so that applications can verify that the contents of a location have not changed due to technical failures (e.g., storage rot, transport glitch, incorrect version).
Comments
The hash is calculated on the data prior to base64 encoding, if the data is based64 encoded. The hash is not intended to support digital signatures. Where protection against malicious threats a digital signature should be considered, see Provenance.signature for mechanism to protect a resource with a digital signature.
Titolo/ nome del documento da utilizzare in fase di visualizzazione
Requirements
Applications need a label to display to a human user in place of the actual data if the data cannot be rendered or perceived by the viewer.
Comments
In XDS.b è rappresentato in ebXML con il "value" dell'attributo dell'elemento LocalizedString all'interno della struttura Name ebRIM. Può esserci solo un ebRIM Name per DocumentEntry.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.code
Short description
Symbol in syntax defined by the system
Definition
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.userSelected
Short description
If this coding was chosen directly by the user
Definition
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
Alternate names
extensions, user content, modifiers
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())
Mappings
workflow: Event.context
w5: FiveWs.context
fhircomposition: Composition.encounter
rim: unique(highest(./outboundRelationship[typeCode="SUBJ" and isNormalActRelationship()], priorityNumber)/target[moodCode="EVN" and classCode=("ENC", "PCPR") and isNormalAct])
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.reference
Short description
Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
Definition
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.
Comments
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.type
Short description
Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
Definition
The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.
The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).
Comments
This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.identifier
Short description
Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
Definition
An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.
Comments
When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy.
When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference
Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it.
Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.display
Short description
Text alternative for the resource
Definition
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.
Comments
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event
Short description
Main clinical acts documented
Definition
This list of codes represents the main clinical acts, such as a colonoscopy or an appendectomy, being documented. In some cases, the event is inherent in the type Code, such as a "History and Physical Report" in which the procedure being documented is necessarily a "History and Physical" act.
Comments
An event can further specialize the act inherent in the type, such as where it is simply "Procedure Report" and the procedure was a "colonoscopy". If one or more event codes are included, they shall not conflict with the values inherent in the class or type elements as such a conflict would create an ambiguous situation.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event.coding:EventMedas
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.facilityType.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.facilityType.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
Additional details about where the content was created (e.g. clinical specialty)
Definition
This property may convey specifics about the practice setting where the content was created, often reflecting the clinical specialty.
Requirements
This is an important piece of metadata that providers often rely upon to quickly sort and/or filter out to find specific content.
Comments
This element should be based on a coarse classification system for the class of specialty practice. Recommend the use of the classification system for Practice Setting, such as that described by the Subject Matter Domain in LOINC.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.reference
Short description
Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
Definition
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.
Comments
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.type
Short description
Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
Definition
The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.
The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).
Comments
This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.
Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
Definition
An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.
Comments
Come descritto in Affinity Domain Italia v2.6.1
Questo metadato consente di identificare a livello nazionale una lista di documenti correlati al
documento a cui il metadato fa riferimento.
Inoltre il metadato può contenere il numero dell’accesso abilitante al caricamento di immagini digitali
in applicativi viewer nel reparto di radiologia.
È obbligatorio valorizzare questo elemento in caso di:
● indicizzazione di una prescrizione dematerializzata generata a partire da un piano
terapeutico utilizzando l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.14;
● indicizzazione di un erogato a partire da una prescrizione dematerializzata utilizzando l’OID
2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.8;
● indicizzazione di un referto generato a partire da una prescrizione dematerializzata
utilizzando l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.8;
● indicizzazione di un’immagine del sistema di radiologia quando è associato il numero di
accesso utile per l’apertura del viewer immagine utilizzando l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.2;
Esempio Order Id:
<rim:Slot name="urn:ihe:iti:xds:2013:referenceIdList">
rim:ValueListrim:Value
Affinity Domain Italia Vers. 2.6.1 Pag. 31 di 74
[NRE]^^^&2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.8&ISO^urn:ihe:iti:xds:2013:order
</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.identifier.type
Short description
Description of identifier
Definition
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
The portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system.
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.display
Short description
Text alternative for the resource
Definition
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.
Comments
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference
Short description
A reference to a document
Definition
A reference to a document of any kind for any purpose. Provides metadata about the document so that the document can be discovered and managed. The scope of a document is any seralized object with a mime-type, so includes formal patient centric documents (CDA), cliical notes, scanned paper, and non-patient specific documents like policy text.
Comments
Usually, this is used for documents other than those defined by FHIR.
dom-2: If the resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT contain nested Resources contained.contained.empty()
dom-3: If the resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL be referred to from elsewhere in the resource or SHALL refer to the containing resource contained.where((('#'+id in (%resource.descendants().reference | %resource.descendants().as(canonical) | %resource.descendants().as(uri) | %resource.descendants().as(url))) or descendants().where(reference = '#').exists() or descendants().where(as(canonical) = '#').exists() or descendants().where(as(canonical) = '#').exists()).not()).trace('unmatched', id).empty()
dom-4: If a resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT have a meta.versionId or a meta.lastUpdated contained.meta.versionId.empty() and contained.meta.lastUpdated.empty()
dom-5: If a resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT have a security label contained.meta.security.empty()
dom-6: A resource should have narrative for robust management text.`div`.exists()
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.meta
Short description
Metadata about the resource
Definition
The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.implicitRules
Short description
A set of rules under which this content was created
Definition
A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.
Comments
Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.language
Short description
Language of the resource content
Definition
The base language in which the resource is written.
Comments
Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.text
Short description
Text summary of the resource, for human interpretation
Alternate names
narrative, html, xhtml, display
Definition
A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.
Comments
Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.
These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.
Comments
This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Identificativo univoco del documento sul sistema sorgente, corrisponde all'identificativo del documento assegnato e generato dal verticale da cui proviene il documento.
Questo identificativo univoco può essere utilizzato per identificare il documento in qualsiasi sistema.
Requirements
The structure and format of this Id shall be consistent with the specification corresponding to the formatCode attribute. (e.g. for a DICOM standard document a 64-character numeric UID, for an HL7 CDA format a serialization of the CDA Document Id extension and root in the form "oid^extension", where OID is a 64 digits max, and the Id is a 16 UTF-8 char max. If the OID is coded without the extension then the '^' character shall not be included.).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.type
Short description
Description of identifier
Definition
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
Valore univoco dell'identificativo associato al documento dal sistema sorgente
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.assigner
Short description
Organization that issued id (may be just text)
Definition
Organization that issued/manages the identifier.
Comments
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
Identificativo del documento che crea il CDR in fase di ingestion, non presente in input dai verticali
Comments
L'attributo entryUUID è un identificatore univoco globale destinato principalmente alla gestione interna dei documenti Scopi. Al contrario, l'attributo uniqueId viene utilizzato per i riferimenti esterni (ad esempio, collegamenti, ecc.).
Esempio XDS:
Il valore di entryUUID è codificato nell'attributo id XML su ExtrinsicObject che rappresenta il DocumentEntry. Nell'esempio seguente, la voceUUID è urn:uuid:a6e06ca8-0c75-4064-9e5c-88b9045a96f6
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.identifier.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.identifier.type
Short description
Description of identifier
Definition
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
L'identificativo dovrà essere composta dalla concatenazione di (DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.value + DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.system)
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.identifier.assigner
Short description
Organization that issued id (may be just text)
Definition
Organization that issued/manages the identifier.
Comments
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())
Mappings
workflow: Event.status
w5: FiveWs.status
v2: TXA-19
rim: interim: .completionCode="IN" & ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="active"; final: .completionCode="AU" && ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="complete" and not(./inboundRelationship[typeCode="SUBJ" and isNormalActRelationship()]/source[subsumesCode("ActClass#CACT") and moodCode="EVN" and domainMember("ReviseDocument", code) and isNormalAct()]); amended: .completionCode="AU" && ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="complete" and ./inboundRelationship[typeCode="SUBJ" and isNormalActRelationship()]/source[subsumesCode("ActClass#CACT") and moodCode="EVN" and domainMember("ReviseDocument", code) and isNormalAct() and statusCode="completed"]; withdrawn : .completionCode=NI && ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="obsolete"
Tipologia del documento.
Il codice che specifica il tipo preciso di documento dal punto di vista dell'utente (ad esempio, il codice LOINC).
Comments
Nell'esempio seguente è contenuto un valore di codice (10160-0) dello schema di codifica LOINC, identificato da un OID (2.16.840.1.113883.6.1).
Esempio XDS:
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())
Mappings
workflow: Event.code
w5: FiveWs.class
fhircomposition: Composition.type
v2: TXA-2
rim: ./code
xds: DocumentEntry.type
cda: ClinicalDocument/code/@code
The typeCode should be mapped from the ClinicalDocument/code element to a set of document type codes configured in the affinity domain. One suggested coding system to use for typeCode is LOINC, in which case the mapping step can be omitted.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Valorizzare con uno delle descrizioni presenti nella tabella Affinity Domain Tabella 2.19-1.
Value set per il metadato XDSDocumentEntry.typeCode
I valori ammissibili per questo metadato devono corrispondere ai codici LOINC riportati in Tabella
2.19-1
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.system
Short description
Identity of the terminology system
Definition
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.userSelected
Short description
If this coding was chosen directly by the user
Definition
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeAffinityDomain
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Lo schema di codifica deve essere valorizzato con l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.6.1.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeMedas
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeMedas.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeMedas.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
Valorizzare con uno delle descrizioni presenti nella tabella Affinity Domain Tabella 2.19-1. Value set per il metadato XDSDocumentEntry.typeCode
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
Categorizzazione del tipo di documento a cui si fa riferimento
Comments
Key metadata element describing the the category or classification of the document. This is a broader perspective that groups similar documents based on how they would be used. This is a primary key used in searching.
Codice che specifica la classificazione di utilizzo di alto livello del tipo di documento (ad esempio, Report, Riepilogo, Immagini, Piano di trattamento, Preferenze del paziente, Flusso di lavoro).
In riferimento alla Tabella 2.3-1. Value set per il metadato XDSDocumentEntry.classCode di Affinity Domain Italia
Esempio XDS :
cda: Derived from a mapping of /ClinicalDocument/code/@code to an Affinity Domain specified coded value to use and coding system. Affinity Domains are encouraged to use the appropriate value for Type of Service, based on the LOINC Type of Service (see Page 53 of the LOINC User's Manual). Must be consistent with /ClinicalDocument/code/@code
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Lo schema di codifica deve essere valorizzato con l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.3.3.6.1.5 come da Affinity Domain
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Metadato che rappresenta la classe a cui il documento appartiene.
I valori ammissibili per questo metadato sono elencati in Tabella 2.3-1 dell'affinity domain.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding.userSelected
Short description
If this coding was chosen directly by the user
Definition
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
A chi o a cosa si riferisce il documento. Il documento può riguardare una persona (paziente o operatore sanitario), un dispositivo (ad esempio una macchina) o anche un gruppo di soggetti (come un documento su una mandria di animali da allevamento o un insieme di pazienti che condividono un'esposizione comune).
Comments
In XDS corrisponde a DocumentEntry.patientId
Questo metadato permette di identificare il paziente a cui è correlato il documento prodotto, in
particolare il codice fiscale se è un cittadino italiano assistito dal SSN
Il metadato identifica l’autore del documento che deve essere indicizzato.
Nel caso di una transazione ITI-41 , viene solitamente fatto coincidere con una reference ad un PractitionerRole
In XDS.b l'attributo è composto dalle informazioni "authorInstitution" ed "authorPerson"
AuthorInstitution identifica la struttura a cui appartiene l’autore che ha creato il
documento.
AuthorPerson e identifica il codice fiscale della persona fisica che ha creato il documento in qualità di autore o, in sua assenza, la partita IVA della persona giuridica al quale si riferisce l’autore.
La persona o istituzione che ha validato/firmato legalmente il documento.
Comments
Rappresenta un partecipante all'interno di un'istituzione autrice che ha legalmente autenticato o attestato il documento. L'autenticazione legale implica che un documento sia stato firmato manualmente o elettronicamente dal legalAuthenticator.
Viene solitamente fatto coincidere con una reference ad un Practitioner
Esempio XDS.b:
<rim:Slot name="legalAuthenticator">
rim:ValueListrim:Value^Welby^Marcus^^^Dr^MD</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.custodian
Short description
Organization which maintains the document
Definition
Identifies the organization or group who is responsible for ongoing maintenance of and access to the document.
Comments
Identifies the logical organization (software system, vendor, or department) to go to find the current version, where to report issues, etc. This is different from the physical location (URL, disk drive, or server) of the document, which is the technical location of the document, which host may be delegated to the management of some other organization.
Esprime la relazione con un altro documento esistente.
Comments
In una operazione di aggiornamento di un documento, verrà inserito l'identificativo (master identifier) esistente del documento "padre" da cui questa risorsa deriva.
L’elemento Association deve essere utilizzato per associare un oggetto XDSDocumentEntry all’oggetto XDSSubmissionSet e per indicare relazioni tra documenti.
Esempio XDS.b in caso di REPLACE (sostituzione o aggiornamento di un documento esistente):
<Association associationType="urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:RPLC" id="ExampleRPLId_001" sourceObject="urn:uuid:08a15a6f-5b4a-42de-8f95-
89474f83ytuz" targetObject="urn:uuid:08a15a6f-5b4a-42de-8f95-89474f83abdf"/>
Un altro esempio di valorizzazione riguardante l’aggiornamento dei soli metadati e non del relativo
documento nel repository è mostrato di seguito:
<rim:Association associationType="urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep:AssociationType:HasMember" id="urn:uuid:f0306f51-975f-434e-a61c-c5943d3862" sourceObject="urn:uuid:a6e06ca8-0c75-4064-9e5c-88b9045a96f6" targetObject="Documento01">
<rim:Slot name="SubmissionSetStatus">
rim:ValueListrim:ValueOriginal</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
</rim:Association>
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
Alternate names
extensions, user content, modifiers
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The type of relationship that this document has with anther document.
Comments
Tipi di associazioni (associationType) per un corretto mapping XDS.b:
urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep AssociationType:HasMember : Appartenenza di un oggetto XDSDocumentEntry all’oggetto XDSSubmissionSet
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:RPLC : Sostituzione (Replace)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:XFRM : Trasformazione (Transformation)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:APND : Aggiunta (Addendum)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:XFRM_RPLC : Sostituzione con trasformazione (Replace with transformation)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:signs : Firma digitale (Digital Signature)
urn:ihe:iti:2010:AssociationType:IsSnapshotOf Istantanea di un insieme di metadati creati on-demand (Snapshot of on-demand document entry)
I riferimenti DEVONO essere un riferimento a una risorsa FHIR effettiva e DEVONO essere risolvibili (consentendo il controllo degli accessi, l'indisponibilità temporanea, ecc.). La risoluzione può avvenire tramite recupero dall'URL o, ove applicabile in base al tipo di risorsa, trattando un riferimento assoluto come un URL canonico e cercandolo in un registro/repository locale.
Nel caso di replace/update di un documento esistente, verrà quindi inserita la reference alla risorsa FHIR di tale documento già presente.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.reference
Short description
Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
Definition
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.
Comments
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.type
Short description
Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
Definition
The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.
The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).
Comments
This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.
Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
Definition
An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.
Comments
In questo caso sarà popolato con il DocumentReference.masterIdentifier della risorsa "padre" da sostituire.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
Da assegnare lo stesso valore di "DocumentReference.masterIdentifier" del documento da sostituire
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.display
Short description
Text alternative for the resource
Definition
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.
Comments
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
Una serie di codici Security-Tag che specificano il livello di privacy/sicurezza del documento.
Questo metadato viene utilizzato per indicare il livello di riservatezza dei dati contenuti nel
documento che deve essere indicizzato.
Se il documento che deve essere indicizzato è in formato HL7 CDA Release 2.0, allora il valore di
questo metadato corrisponde al valore dell’attributo /ClinicalDocument/confidentialityCode/@code.
Requirements
Use of the Health Care Privacy/Security Classification (HCS) system of security-tag use is recommended.
Comments
Lista di valori possibili definiti da Affinity domain Italia.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.coding.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Lo schema di codifica deve essere valorizzato con l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.5.25
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.coding.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
Contiene informazioni riguardanti il documento da sottomettere ed il suo formato.
Potrebbe contenere una lista di elementi e ripetizioni, ognuno con un formato differente.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
Alternate names
extensions, user content, modifiers
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Contenuto valorizzato con il repository Id assegnato da FSE
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Tale metadato identifica il MIME type del documento indicizzato e ha lo scopo di fornire indicazione
all’attore XDS Document Consumer sulla tipologia del documento.
Nel formato XDS.b viene mappato con DocumentEntry.mimeType.
Esempio XDS.b:
<rim:ExtrinsicObject mimeType="text/x-cda-r2+xml" id="Document01"
objectType="urn:uuid:7edca82f-054d-47f2-a032-9b2a5b5186c1">
Requirements
Processors of the data need to be able to know how to interpret the data.
Riferimento alla url della risorsa Binary contenuta nel Bundle.
Requirements
The data needs to be transmitted by reference.
Comments
In XDS.b DocumentEntry.repositoryUniqueId or DocumentEntry.URI
Esempi XDS.b:
DocumentEntry.repositoryUniqueId
L'identificativo globale univoco del repository nel quale il document referenziato da DocumentEntry può essere recuperato.
<rim:Slot name="repositoryUniqueId">
rim:ValueListrim:Value1.3.6.1.4.5</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
DocumentEntry.URI
URI al documento
<rim:Slot name="URI">
rim:ValueListrim:ValueDOC001.XML</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.attachment.hash
Short description
Hash of the data (sha-1, base64ed)
Definition
The calculated hash of the data using SHA-1. Represented using base64.
Requirements
Included so that applications can verify that the contents of a location have not changed due to technical failures (e.g., storage rot, transport glitch, incorrect version).
Comments
The hash is calculated on the data prior to base64 encoding, if the data is based64 encoded. The hash is not intended to support digital signatures. Where protection against malicious threats a digital signature should be considered, see Provenance.signature for mechanism to protect a resource with a digital signature.
Titolo/ nome del documento da utilizzare in fase di visualizzazione
Requirements
Applications need a label to display to a human user in place of the actual data if the data cannot be rendered or perceived by the viewer.
Comments
In XDS.b è rappresentato in ebXML con il "value" dell'attributo dell'elemento LocalizedString all'interno della struttura Name ebRIM. Può esserci solo un ebRIM Name per DocumentEntry.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.code
Short description
Symbol in syntax defined by the system
Definition
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.userSelected
Short description
If this coding was chosen directly by the user
Definition
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
Alternate names
extensions, user content, modifiers
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())
Mappings
workflow: Event.context
w5: FiveWs.context
fhircomposition: Composition.encounter
rim: unique(highest(./outboundRelationship[typeCode="SUBJ" and isNormalActRelationship()], priorityNumber)/target[moodCode="EVN" and classCode=("ENC", "PCPR") and isNormalAct])
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.reference
Short description
Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
Definition
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.
Comments
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.type
Short description
Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
Definition
The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.
The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).
Comments
This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.identifier
Short description
Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
Definition
An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.
Comments
When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy.
When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference
Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it.
Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.display
Short description
Text alternative for the resource
Definition
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.
Comments
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event
Short description
Main clinical acts documented
Definition
This list of codes represents the main clinical acts, such as a colonoscopy or an appendectomy, being documented. In some cases, the event is inherent in the type Code, such as a "History and Physical Report" in which the procedure being documented is necessarily a "History and Physical" act.
Comments
An event can further specialize the act inherent in the type, such as where it is simply "Procedure Report" and the procedure was a "colonoscopy". If one or more event codes are included, they shall not conflict with the values inherent in the class or type elements as such a conflict would create an ambiguous situation.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event.coding:EventMedas
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.facilityType.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.facilityType.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
Additional details about where the content was created (e.g. clinical specialty)
Definition
This property may convey specifics about the practice setting where the content was created, often reflecting the clinical specialty.
Requirements
This is an important piece of metadata that providers often rely upon to quickly sort and/or filter out to find specific content.
Comments
This element should be based on a coarse classification system for the class of specialty practice. Recommend the use of the classification system for Practice Setting, such as that described by the Subject Matter Domain in LOINC.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.reference
Short description
Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
Definition
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.
Comments
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.type
Short description
Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
Definition
The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.
The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).
Comments
This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.
Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
Definition
An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.
Comments
Come descritto in Affinity Domain Italia v2.6.1
Questo metadato consente di identificare a livello nazionale una lista di documenti correlati al
documento a cui il metadato fa riferimento.
Inoltre il metadato può contenere il numero dell’accesso abilitante al caricamento di immagini digitali
in applicativi viewer nel reparto di radiologia.
È obbligatorio valorizzare questo elemento in caso di:
● indicizzazione di una prescrizione dematerializzata generata a partire da un piano
terapeutico utilizzando l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.14;
● indicizzazione di un erogato a partire da una prescrizione dematerializzata utilizzando l’OID
2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.8;
● indicizzazione di un referto generato a partire da una prescrizione dematerializzata
utilizzando l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.8;
● indicizzazione di un’immagine del sistema di radiologia quando è associato il numero di
accesso utile per l’apertura del viewer immagine utilizzando l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.2;
Esempio Order Id:
<rim:Slot name="urn:ihe:iti:xds:2013:referenceIdList">
rim:ValueListrim:Value
Affinity Domain Italia Vers. 2.6.1 Pag. 31 di 74
[NRE]^^^&2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.8&ISO^urn:ihe:iti:xds:2013:order
</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.identifier.type
Short description
Description of identifier
Definition
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
The portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system.
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.display
Short description
Text alternative for the resource
Definition
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.
Comments
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference
Short description
A reference to a document
Definition
A reference to a document of any kind for any purpose. Provides metadata about the document so that the document can be discovered and managed. The scope of a document is any seralized object with a mime-type, so includes formal patient centric documents (CDA), cliical notes, scanned paper, and non-patient specific documents like policy text.
Comments
Usually, this is used for documents other than those defined by FHIR.
dom-2: If the resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT contain nested Resources contained.contained.empty()
dom-3: If the resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL be referred to from elsewhere in the resource or SHALL refer to the containing resource contained.where((('#'+id in (%resource.descendants().reference | %resource.descendants().as(canonical) | %resource.descendants().as(uri) | %resource.descendants().as(url))) or descendants().where(reference = '#').exists() or descendants().where(as(canonical) = '#').exists() or descendants().where(as(canonical) = '#').exists()).not()).trace('unmatched', id).empty()
dom-4: If a resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT have a meta.versionId or a meta.lastUpdated contained.meta.versionId.empty() and contained.meta.lastUpdated.empty()
dom-5: If a resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT have a security label contained.meta.security.empty()
dom-6: A resource should have narrative for robust management text.`div`.exists()
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.meta
Short description
Metadata about the resource
Definition
The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.implicitRules
Short description
A set of rules under which this content was created
Definition
A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.
Comments
Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.language
Short description
Language of the resource content
Definition
The base language in which the resource is written.
Comments
Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.text
Short description
Text summary of the resource, for human interpretation
Alternate names
narrative, html, xhtml, display
Definition
A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.
Comments
Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.
These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.
Comments
This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Identificativo univoco del documento sul sistema sorgente, corrisponde all'identificativo del documento assegnato e generato dal verticale da cui proviene il documento.
Questo identificativo univoco può essere utilizzato per identificare il documento in qualsiasi sistema.
Requirements
The structure and format of this Id shall be consistent with the specification corresponding to the formatCode attribute. (e.g. for a DICOM standard document a 64-character numeric UID, for an HL7 CDA format a serialization of the CDA Document Id extension and root in the form "oid^extension", where OID is a 64 digits max, and the Id is a 16 UTF-8 char max. If the OID is coded without the extension then the '^' character shall not be included.).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.type
Short description
Description of identifier
Definition
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
Valore univoco dell'identificativo associato al documento dal sistema sorgente
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.assigner
Short description
Organization that issued id (may be just text)
Definition
Organization that issued/manages the identifier.
Comments
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
Identificativo del documento che crea il CDR in fase di ingestion, non presente in input dai verticali
Comments
L'attributo entryUUID è un identificatore univoco globale destinato principalmente alla gestione interna dei documenti Scopi. Al contrario, l'attributo uniqueId viene utilizzato per i riferimenti esterni (ad esempio, collegamenti, ecc.).
Esempio XDS:
Il valore di entryUUID è codificato nell'attributo id XML su ExtrinsicObject che rappresenta il DocumentEntry. Nell'esempio seguente, la voceUUID è urn:uuid:a6e06ca8-0c75-4064-9e5c-88b9045a96f6
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.identifier.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.identifier.type
Short description
Description of identifier
Definition
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
L'identificativo dovrà essere composta dalla concatenazione di (DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.value + DocumentReference.masterIdentifier.system)
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.identifier.assigner
Short description
Organization that issued id (may be just text)
Definition
Organization that issued/manages the identifier.
Comments
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())
Mappings
workflow: Event.status
w5: FiveWs.status
v2: TXA-19
rim: interim: .completionCode="IN" & ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="active"; final: .completionCode="AU" && ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="complete" and not(./inboundRelationship[typeCode="SUBJ" and isNormalActRelationship()]/source[subsumesCode("ActClass#CACT") and moodCode="EVN" and domainMember("ReviseDocument", code) and isNormalAct()]); amended: .completionCode="AU" && ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="complete" and ./inboundRelationship[typeCode="SUBJ" and isNormalActRelationship()]/source[subsumesCode("ActClass#CACT") and moodCode="EVN" and domainMember("ReviseDocument", code) and isNormalAct() and statusCode="completed"]; withdrawn : .completionCode=NI && ./statusCode[isNormalDatatype()]="obsolete"
Tipologia del documento.
Il codice che specifica il tipo preciso di documento dal punto di vista dell'utente (ad esempio, il codice LOINC).
Comments
Nell'esempio seguente è contenuto un valore di codice (10160-0) dello schema di codifica LOINC, identificato da un OID (2.16.840.1.113883.6.1).
Esempio XDS:
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())
Mappings
workflow: Event.code
w5: FiveWs.class
fhircomposition: Composition.type
v2: TXA-2
rim: ./code
xds: DocumentEntry.type
cda: ClinicalDocument/code/@code
The typeCode should be mapped from the ClinicalDocument/code element to a set of document type codes configured in the affinity domain. One suggested coding system to use for typeCode is LOINC, in which case the mapping step can be omitted.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Valorizzare con uno delle descrizioni presenti nella tabella Affinity Domain Tabella 2.19-1.
Value set per il metadato XDSDocumentEntry.typeCode
I valori ammissibili per questo metadato devono corrispondere ai codici LOINC riportati in Tabella
2.19-1
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.system
Short description
Identity of the terminology system
Definition
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding.userSelected
Short description
If this coding was chosen directly by the user
Definition
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeAffinityDomain
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Lo schema di codifica deve essere valorizzato con l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.6.1.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeMedas
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeMedas.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.type.coding:TypeMedas.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
Valorizzare con uno delle descrizioni presenti nella tabella Affinity Domain Tabella 2.19-1. Value set per il metadato XDSDocumentEntry.typeCode
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
Categorizzazione del tipo di documento a cui si fa riferimento
Comments
Key metadata element describing the the category or classification of the document. This is a broader perspective that groups similar documents based on how they would be used. This is a primary key used in searching.
Codice che specifica la classificazione di utilizzo di alto livello del tipo di documento (ad esempio, Report, Riepilogo, Immagini, Piano di trattamento, Preferenze del paziente, Flusso di lavoro).
In riferimento alla Tabella 2.3-1. Value set per il metadato XDSDocumentEntry.classCode di Affinity Domain Italia
Esempio XDS :
cda: Derived from a mapping of /ClinicalDocument/code/@code to an Affinity Domain specified coded value to use and coding system. Affinity Domains are encouraged to use the appropriate value for Type of Service, based on the LOINC Type of Service (see Page 53 of the LOINC User's Manual). Must be consistent with /ClinicalDocument/code/@code
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Lo schema di codifica deve essere valorizzato con l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.3.3.6.1.5 come da Affinity Domain
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Metadato che rappresenta la classe a cui il documento appartiene.
I valori ammissibili per questo metadato sono elencati in Tabella 2.3-1 dell'affinity domain.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.coding.userSelected
Short description
If this coding was chosen directly by the user
Definition
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.category.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
A chi o a cosa si riferisce il documento. Il documento può riguardare una persona (paziente o operatore sanitario), un dispositivo (ad esempio una macchina) o anche un gruppo di soggetti (come un documento su una mandria di animali da allevamento o un insieme di pazienti che condividono un'esposizione comune).
Comments
In XDS corrisponde a DocumentEntry.patientId
Questo metadato permette di identificare il paziente a cui è correlato il documento prodotto, in
particolare il codice fiscale se è un cittadino italiano assistito dal SSN
Il metadato identifica l’autore del documento che deve essere indicizzato.
Nel caso di una transazione ITI-41 , viene solitamente fatto coincidere con una reference ad un PractitionerRole
In XDS.b l'attributo è composto dalle informazioni "authorInstitution" ed "authorPerson"
AuthorInstitution identifica la struttura a cui appartiene l’autore che ha creato il
documento.
AuthorPerson e identifica il codice fiscale della persona fisica che ha creato il documento in qualità di autore o, in sua assenza, la partita IVA della persona giuridica al quale si riferisce l’autore.
La persona o istituzione che ha validato/firmato legalmente il documento.
Comments
Rappresenta un partecipante all'interno di un'istituzione autrice che ha legalmente autenticato o attestato il documento. L'autenticazione legale implica che un documento sia stato firmato manualmente o elettronicamente dal legalAuthenticator.
Viene solitamente fatto coincidere con una reference ad un Practitioner
Esempio XDS.b:
<rim:Slot name="legalAuthenticator">
rim:ValueListrim:Value^Welby^Marcus^^^Dr^MD</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.custodian
Short description
Organization which maintains the document
Definition
Identifies the organization or group who is responsible for ongoing maintenance of and access to the document.
Comments
Identifies the logical organization (software system, vendor, or department) to go to find the current version, where to report issues, etc. This is different from the physical location (URL, disk drive, or server) of the document, which is the technical location of the document, which host may be delegated to the management of some other organization.
Esprime la relazione con un altro documento esistente.
Comments
In una operazione di aggiornamento di un documento, verrà inserito l'identificativo (master identifier) esistente del documento "padre" da cui questa risorsa deriva.
L’elemento Association deve essere utilizzato per associare un oggetto XDSDocumentEntry all’oggetto XDSSubmissionSet e per indicare relazioni tra documenti.
Esempio XDS.b in caso di REPLACE (sostituzione o aggiornamento di un documento esistente):
<Association associationType="urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:RPLC" id="ExampleRPLId_001" sourceObject="urn:uuid:08a15a6f-5b4a-42de-8f95-
89474f83ytuz" targetObject="urn:uuid:08a15a6f-5b4a-42de-8f95-89474f83abdf"/>
Un altro esempio di valorizzazione riguardante l’aggiornamento dei soli metadati e non del relativo
documento nel repository è mostrato di seguito:
<rim:Association associationType="urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep:AssociationType:HasMember" id="urn:uuid:f0306f51-975f-434e-a61c-c5943d3862" sourceObject="urn:uuid:a6e06ca8-0c75-4064-9e5c-88b9045a96f6" targetObject="Documento01">
<rim:Slot name="SubmissionSetStatus">
rim:ValueListrim:ValueOriginal</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
</rim:Association>
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
Alternate names
extensions, user content, modifiers
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The type of relationship that this document has with anther document.
Comments
Tipi di associazioni (associationType) per un corretto mapping XDS.b:
urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep AssociationType:HasMember : Appartenenza di un oggetto XDSDocumentEntry all’oggetto XDSSubmissionSet
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:RPLC : Sostituzione (Replace)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:XFRM : Trasformazione (Transformation)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:APND : Aggiunta (Addendum)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:XFRM_RPLC : Sostituzione con trasformazione (Replace with transformation)
urn:ihe:iti:2007:AssociationType:signs : Firma digitale (Digital Signature)
urn:ihe:iti:2010:AssociationType:IsSnapshotOf Istantanea di un insieme di metadati creati on-demand (Snapshot of on-demand document entry)
I riferimenti DEVONO essere un riferimento a una risorsa FHIR effettiva e DEVONO essere risolvibili (consentendo il controllo degli accessi, l'indisponibilità temporanea, ecc.). La risoluzione può avvenire tramite recupero dall'URL o, ove applicabile in base al tipo di risorsa, trattando un riferimento assoluto come un URL canonico e cercandolo in un registro/repository locale.
Nel caso di replace/update di un documento esistente, verrà quindi inserita la reference alla risorsa FHIR di tale documento già presente.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.reference
Short description
Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
Definition
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.
Comments
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.type
Short description
Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
Definition
The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.
The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).
Comments
This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.
Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
Definition
An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.
Comments
In questo caso sarà popolato con il DocumentReference.masterIdentifier della risorsa "padre" da sostituire.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
Da assegnare lo stesso valore di "DocumentReference.masterIdentifier" del documento da sostituire
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.relatesTo.target.display
Short description
Text alternative for the resource
Definition
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.
Comments
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
Una serie di codici Security-Tag che specificano il livello di privacy/sicurezza del documento.
Questo metadato viene utilizzato per indicare il livello di riservatezza dei dati contenuti nel
documento che deve essere indicizzato.
Se il documento che deve essere indicizzato è in formato HL7 CDA Release 2.0, allora il valore di
questo metadato corrisponde al valore dell’attributo /ClinicalDocument/confidentialityCode/@code.
Requirements
Use of the Health Care Privacy/Security Classification (HCS) system of security-tag use is recommended.
Comments
Lista di valori possibili definiti da Affinity domain Italia.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.coding.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Lo schema di codifica deve essere valorizzato con l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.5.25
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.coding.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.securityLabel.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
Contiene informazioni riguardanti il documento da sottomettere ed il suo formato.
Potrebbe contenere una lista di elementi e ripetizioni, ognuno con un formato differente.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
Alternate names
extensions, user content, modifiers
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Contenuto valorizzato con il repository Id assegnato da FSE
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Tale metadato identifica il MIME type del documento indicizzato e ha lo scopo di fornire indicazione
all’attore XDS Document Consumer sulla tipologia del documento.
Nel formato XDS.b viene mappato con DocumentEntry.mimeType.
Esempio XDS.b:
<rim:ExtrinsicObject mimeType="text/x-cda-r2+xml" id="Document01"
objectType="urn:uuid:7edca82f-054d-47f2-a032-9b2a5b5186c1">
Requirements
Processors of the data need to be able to know how to interpret the data.
Riferimento alla url della risorsa Binary contenuta nel Bundle.
Requirements
The data needs to be transmitted by reference.
Comments
In XDS.b DocumentEntry.repositoryUniqueId or DocumentEntry.URI
Esempi XDS.b:
DocumentEntry.repositoryUniqueId
L'identificativo globale univoco del repository nel quale il document referenziato da DocumentEntry può essere recuperato.
<rim:Slot name="repositoryUniqueId">
rim:ValueListrim:Value1.3.6.1.4.5</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
DocumentEntry.URI
URI al documento
<rim:Slot name="URI">
rim:ValueListrim:ValueDOC001.XML</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.attachment.hash
Short description
Hash of the data (sha-1, base64ed)
Definition
The calculated hash of the data using SHA-1. Represented using base64.
Requirements
Included so that applications can verify that the contents of a location have not changed due to technical failures (e.g., storage rot, transport glitch, incorrect version).
Comments
The hash is calculated on the data prior to base64 encoding, if the data is based64 encoded. The hash is not intended to support digital signatures. Where protection against malicious threats a digital signature should be considered, see Provenance.signature for mechanism to protect a resource with a digital signature.
Titolo/ nome del documento da utilizzare in fase di visualizzazione
Requirements
Applications need a label to display to a human user in place of the actual data if the data cannot be rendered or perceived by the viewer.
Comments
In XDS.b è rappresentato in ebXML con il "value" dell'attributo dell'elemento LocalizedString all'interno della struttura Name ebRIM. Può esserci solo un ebRIM Name per DocumentEntry.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.version
Short description
Version of the system - if relevant
Definition
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.code
Short description
Symbol in syntax defined by the system
Definition
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.content.format.userSelected
Short description
If this coding was chosen directly by the user
Definition
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.modifierExtension
Short description
Extensions that cannot be ignored even if unrecognized
Alternate names
extensions, user content, modifiers
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.
Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
Requirements
Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children hasValue() or (children().count() > id.count())
Mappings
workflow: Event.context
w5: FiveWs.context
fhircomposition: Composition.encounter
rim: unique(highest(./outboundRelationship[typeCode="SUBJ" and isNormalActRelationship()], priorityNumber)/target[moodCode="EVN" and classCode=("ENC", "PCPR") and isNormalAct])
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.reference
Short description
Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
Definition
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.
Comments
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.type
Short description
Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
Definition
The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.
The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).
Comments
This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.identifier
Short description
Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
Definition
An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.
Comments
When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy.
When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference
Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it.
Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.encounter.display
Short description
Text alternative for the resource
Definition
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.
Comments
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event
Short description
Main clinical acts documented
Definition
This list of codes represents the main clinical acts, such as a colonoscopy or an appendectomy, being documented. In some cases, the event is inherent in the type Code, such as a "History and Physical Report" in which the procedure being documented is necessarily a "History and Physical" act.
Comments
An event can further specialize the act inherent in the type, such as where it is simply "Procedure Report" and the procedure was a "colonoscopy". If one or more event codes are included, they shall not conflict with the values inherent in the class or type elements as such a conflict would create an ambiguous situation.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event.coding:EventMedas
Short description
Code defined by a terminology system
Definition
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.
Requirements
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.
Comments
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.
Comments
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).
Requirements
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.
Comments
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.event.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.facilityType.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.
Requirements
Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.
Comments
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.facilityType.text
Short description
Plain text representation of the concept
Definition
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.
Requirements
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.
Comments
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.
Additional details about where the content was created (e.g. clinical specialty)
Definition
This property may convey specifics about the practice setting where the content was created, often reflecting the clinical specialty.
Requirements
This is an important piece of metadata that providers often rely upon to quickly sort and/or filter out to find specific content.
Comments
This element should be based on a coarse classification system for the class of specialty practice. Recommend the use of the classification system for Practice Setting, such as that described by the Subject Matter Domain in LOINC.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.extension
Short description
Additional content defined by implementations
Alternate names
extensions, user content
Definition
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.reference
Short description
Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
Definition
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.
Comments
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.type
Short description
Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient")
Definition
The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.
The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).
Comments
This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.
Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
Definition
An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.
Comments
Come descritto in Affinity Domain Italia v2.6.1
Questo metadato consente di identificare a livello nazionale una lista di documenti correlati al
documento a cui il metadato fa riferimento.
Inoltre il metadato può contenere il numero dell’accesso abilitante al caricamento di immagini digitali
in applicativi viewer nel reparto di radiologia.
È obbligatorio valorizzare questo elemento in caso di:
● indicizzazione di una prescrizione dematerializzata generata a partire da un piano
terapeutico utilizzando l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.14;
● indicizzazione di un erogato a partire da una prescrizione dematerializzata utilizzando l’OID
2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.8;
● indicizzazione di un referto generato a partire da una prescrizione dematerializzata
utilizzando l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.8;
● indicizzazione di un’immagine del sistema di radiologia quando è associato il numero di
accesso utile per l’apertura del viewer immagine utilizzando l’OID 2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.2;
Esempio Order Id:
<rim:Slot name="urn:ihe:iti:xds:2013:referenceIdList">
rim:ValueListrim:Value
Affinity Domain Italia Vers. 2.6.1 Pag. 31 di 74
[NRE]^^^&2.16.840.1.113883.2.9.4.3.8&ISO^urn:ihe:iti:xds:2013:order
</rim:Value>
</rim:ValueList>
</rim:Slot>
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
Comments
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.identifier.type
Short description
Description of identifier
Definition
A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.
Requirements
Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.
Comments
This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.
Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.
Requirements
There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.
The portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system.
Comments
If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension. Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.
The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.
There are no (further) constraints on this element
Element id
DocumentReference.context.related.display
Short description
Text alternative for the resource
Definition
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.
Comments
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.
